Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MedIAnomaly: A comparative study of anomaly detection in medical images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.04518 v4 pith:WHJMIBRR submitted 2024-04-06 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords anomalyimagesmedicalmethodsabnormalcomparisondatasetsdetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Anomaly detection (AD) aims at detecting abnormal samples that deviate from the expected normal patterns. Generally, it can be trained merely on normal data, without a requirement for abnormal samples, and thereby plays an important role in rare disease recognition and health screening in the medical domain. Despite the emergence of numerous methods for medical AD, the lack of a fair and comprehensive evaluation causes ambiguous conclusions and hinders the development of this field. To address this problem, this paper builds a benchmark with unified comparison. Seven medical datasets with five image modalities, including chest X-rays, brain MRIs, retinal fundus images, dermatoscopic images, and histopathology images, are curated for extensive evaluation. Thirty typical AD methods, including reconstruction and self-supervised learning-based methods, are involved in comparison of image-level anomaly classification and pixel-level anomaly segmentation. Furthermore, for the first time, we systematically investigate the effect of key components in existing methods, revealing unresolved challenges and potential future directions. The datasets and code are available at https://github.com/caiyu6666/MedIAnomaly.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Q-Former Autoencoder: A Modern Framework for Medical Anomaly Detection

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    QFAE, combining a frozen DINOv2 encoder, a Q-Former bottleneck, and a masked-autoencoder perceptual loss, reaches 94.3, 91.8, and 83.8 AUROC on BraTS2021, RESC, and RSNA.

Pith tools