Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to Support Collaborative Human-AI Online Risk Data Annotation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.07926 v1 pith:OBFF6VSY submitted 2024-04-11 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords datallmsresearchtoolsannotationhuman-aionlinerisk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this position paper, we discuss the potential for leveraging LLMs as interactive research tools to facilitate collaboration between human coders and AI to effectively annotate online risk data at scale. Collaborative human-AI labeling is a promising approach to annotating large-scale and complex data for various tasks. Yet, tools and methods to support effective human-AI collaboration for data annotation are under-studied. This gap is pertinent because co-labeling tasks need to support a two-way interactive discussion that can add nuance and context, particularly in the context of online risk, which is highly subjective and contextualized. Therefore, we provide some of the early benefits and challenges of using LLMs-based tools for risk annotation and suggest future directions for the HCI research community to leverage LLMs as research tools to facilitate human-AI collaboration in contextualized online data annotation. Our research interests align very well with the purposes of the LLMs as Research Tools workshop to identify ongoing applications and challenges of using LLMs to work with data in HCI research. We anticipate learning valuable insights from organizers and participants into how LLMs can help reshape the HCI community's methods for working with data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DialogAgent: An Auto-engagement Agent for Code Question Answering Data Production

    cs.SE 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    DialogAgent automates synthetic code Q&A data production via UI automation and LLM agents, claiming a 33% acceptance-rate improvement in a deployed model.

Pith tools