Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Enhancing Robot Explanation Capabilities through Vision-Language Models: a Preliminary Study by Interpreting Visual Inputs for Improved Human-Robot Interaction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.09705 v1 pith:B4EOTHJN submitted 2024-04-15 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords explanationssystemrobotlogsmodelsvisualhuman-robotimproved
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents an improved system based on our prior work, designed to create explanations for autonomous robot actions during Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Previously, we developed a system that used Large Language Models (LLMs) to interpret logs and produce natural language explanations. In this study, we expand our approach by incorporating Vision-Language Models (VLMs), enabling the system to analyze textual logs with the added context of visual input. This method allows for generating explanations that combine data from the robot's logs and the images it captures. We tested this enhanced system on a basic navigation task where the robot needs to avoid a human obstacle. The findings from this preliminary study indicate that adding visual interpretation improves our system's explanations by precisely identifying obstacles and increasing the accuracy of the explanations provided.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Embodied Hazard Mitigation using Vision-Language Models for Autonomous Mobile Robots

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A VLM+LLM pipeline on an AMR classifies anomalies as Hazardous or Conflict and triggers mitigation actions, reporting 91.2% accuracy and a 6-second average latency in small indoor trials.

Pith tools