Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LogSD: Detecting Anomalies from System Logs through Self-supervised Learning and Frequency-based Masking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.11294 v2 pith:RPAZ3EIF submitted 2024-04-17 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords logsdlearningmethodssemi-supervisedperformanceself-supervisedsystemanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Log analysis is one of the main techniques that engineers use for troubleshooting large-scale software systems. Over the years, many supervised, semi-supervised, and unsupervised log analysis methods have been proposed to detect system anomalies by analyzing system logs. Among these, semi-supervised methods have garnered increasing attention as they strike a balance between relaxed labeled data requirements and optimal detection performance, contrasting with their supervised and unsupervised counterparts. However, existing semi-supervised methods overlook the potential bias introduced by highly frequent log messages on the learned normal patterns, which leads to their less than satisfactory performance. In this study, we propose LogSD, a novel semi-supervised self-supervised learning approach. LogSD employs a dual-network architecture and incorporates a frequency-based masking scheme, a global-to-local reconstruction paradigm and three self-supervised learning tasks. These features enable LogSD to focus more on relatively infrequent log messages, thereby effectively learning less biased and more discriminative patterns from historical normal data. This emphasis ultimately leads to improved anomaly detection performance. Extensive experiments have been conducted on three commonly-used datasets and the results show that LogSD significantly outperforms eight state-of-the-art benchmark methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Practitioners' Expectations on Log Anomaly Detection

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Practitioners want log anomaly detectors that are accurate, fast, explainable, and customizable, but current research rarely delivers on the last three.

Pith tools