Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Pack of LLMs: Model Fusion at Test-Time via Perplexity Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.11531 v1 pith:BW2G3CEV submitted 2024-04-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords fusionllmsperplexitypackllmtest-timeinputaccuracyapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fusing knowledge from multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) can combine their diverse strengths to achieve improved performance on a given task. However, current fusion approaches either rely on learning-based fusers that do not generalize to new LLMs, or do not take into account how well each LLM understands the input. In this work, we study LLM fusion at test-time, which enables leveraging knowledge from arbitrary user-specified LLMs during inference. We introduce Pack of LLMs (PackLLM), an effective method for test-time fusion that leverages each LLM's expertise, given an input prompt. PackLLM performs model fusion by solving an optimization problem for determining each LLM's importance, so that perplexity over the input prompt is minimized. First, our simple PackLLM-sim variant validates that perplexity is a good indicator for measuring each LLM's expertise. Second, our PackLLM-opt variant approximately solves the perplexity minimization problem via a greedy algorithm. The derived importance weights are used to combine the LLMs during inference. We conduct experiments with over 100 total LLMs on a diverse set of tasks. Experimental results show that (i) perplexity is a reliable measure for LLM fusion, (ii) PackLLM outperforms test-time fusion baselines by 1.89% accuracy points, and (iii) PackLLM can leverage new LLMs to improve performance over learning-based fusion approaches by 3.92-11.94% accuracy points.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BEST-Route: Adaptive LLM Routing with Test-Time Optimal Compute

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A routing system that chooses both the model and the number of samples per query to meet a quality threshold, yielding up to 60% cost savings.

  2. Enabling Flexible Multi-LLM Integration for Scalable Knowledge Aggregation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adaptive selection and dynamic weighted fusion of source LLMs reduces knowledge interference and improves target model accuracy compared to FuseLLM.

  3. Why Do More Experts Fail? A Theoretical Analysis of Model Merging

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper claims to prove an upper bound and diminishing returns in model merging, but the proofs are not sound and the heavy-tailed claim is contradicted by its own equations.

Pith tools