REVIEW 3 cited by
Pack of LLMs: Model Fusion at Test-Time via Perplexity Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Fusing knowledge from multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) can combine their diverse strengths to achieve improved performance on a given task. However, current fusion approaches either rely on learning-based fusers that do not generalize to new LLMs, or do not take into account how well each LLM understands the input. In this work, we study LLM fusion at test-time, which enables leveraging knowledge from arbitrary user-specified LLMs during inference. We introduce Pack of LLMs (PackLLM), an effective method for test-time fusion that leverages each LLM's expertise, given an input prompt. PackLLM performs model fusion by solving an optimization problem for determining each LLM's importance, so that perplexity over the input prompt is minimized. First, our simple PackLLM-sim variant validates that perplexity is a good indicator for measuring each LLM's expertise. Second, our PackLLM-opt variant approximately solves the perplexity minimization problem via a greedy algorithm. The derived importance weights are used to combine the LLMs during inference. We conduct experiments with over 100 total LLMs on a diverse set of tasks. Experimental results show that (i) perplexity is a reliable measure for LLM fusion, (ii) PackLLM outperforms test-time fusion baselines by 1.89% accuracy points, and (iii) PackLLM can leverage new LLMs to improve performance over learning-based fusion approaches by 3.92-11.94% accuracy points.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
BEST-Route: Adaptive LLM Routing with Test-Time Optimal Compute
A routing system that chooses both the model and the number of samples per query to meet a quality threshold, yielding up to 60% cost savings.
-
Enabling Flexible Multi-LLM Integration for Scalable Knowledge Aggregation
Adaptive selection and dynamic weighted fusion of source LLMs reduces knowledge interference and improves target model accuracy compared to FuseLLM.
-
Why Do More Experts Fail? A Theoretical Analysis of Model Merging
The paper claims to prove an upper bound and diminishing returns in model merging, but the proofs are not sound and the heavy-tailed claim is contradicted by its own equations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.