Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MCRanker: Generating Diverse Criteria On-the-Fly to Improve Point-wise LLM Rankers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.11960 v3 pith:5XZDGM25 submitted 2024-04-18 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords criteriarankersrankingpointwisetheyachievedaddressapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The most recent pointwise Large Language Model (LLM) rankers have achieved remarkable ranking results. However, these rankers are hindered by two major drawbacks: (1) they fail to follow a standardized comparison guidance during the ranking process, and (2) they struggle with comprehensive considerations when dealing with complicated passages. To address these shortcomings, we propose to build a ranker that generates ranking scores based on a set of criteria from various perspectives. These criteria are intended to direct each perspective in providing a distinct yet synergistic evaluation. Our research, which examines eight datasets from the BEIR benchmark demonstrates that incorporating this multi-perspective criteria ensemble approach markedly enhanced the performance of pointwise LLM rankers.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Likert or Not: LLM Absolute Relevance Judgments on Fine-Grained Ordinal Scales

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Pointwise LLM scoring with an 11-point ordinal scale is statistically competitive with listwise ranking for 31 of 40 model-dataset combinations on NDCG@10.

  2. Precise Zero-Shot Pointwise Ranking with LLMs through Post-Aggregated Global Context Information

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A summary-based anchor document enables contrastive pointwise scoring that, when averaged with ordinary pointwise scores, improves zero-shot LLM reranking.

  3. LGAR: Zero-Shot LLM-Guided Neural Ranking for Abstract Screening in Systematic Literature Reviews

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LGAR combines zero-shot LLM graded relevance scoring with monoT5 re-ranking to rank abstracts for systematic reviews, outperforming QA-based baselines by 5-10 pp MAP on two benchmarks.

Pith tools