Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

What does CLIP know about peeling a banana?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.12015 v1 pith:TY6Z5GYO submitted 2024-04-18 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords actionsaffordanceclipmodelsobjectsaffordanceclipcomparedlimitations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Humans show an innate capability to identify tools to support specific actions. The association between objects parts and the actions they facilitate is usually named affordance. Being able to segment objects parts depending on the tasks they afford is crucial to enable intelligent robots to use objects of daily living. Traditional supervised learning methods for affordance segmentation require costly pixel-level annotations, while weakly supervised approaches, though less demanding, still rely on object-interaction examples and support a closed set of actions. These limitations hinder scalability, may introduce biases, and usually restrict models to a limited set of predefined actions. This paper proposes AffordanceCLIP, to overcome these limitations by leveraging the implicit affordance knowledge embedded within large pre-trained Vision-Language models like CLIP. We experimentally demonstrate that CLIP, although not explicitly trained for affordances detection, retains valuable information for the task. Our AffordanceCLIP achieves competitive zero-shot performance compared to methods with specialized training, while offering several advantages: i) it works with any action prompt, not just a predefined set; ii) it requires training only a small number of additional parameters compared to existing solutions and iii) eliminates the need for direct supervision on action-object pairs, opening new perspectives for functionality-based reasoning of models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CRAFT: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Visual Functional Affordance Grounding

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CRAFT combines ConceptNet or LLM-derived affordance priors with CLIP visual similarity in an iterative energy-based re-ranking loop, achieving the best non-oracle accuracy on a functional affordance grounding benchmark.

Pith tools