Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Age analysis of extrasolar planets: Insight from stellar isochrone models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.13398 v1 pith:GNRRSEQ5 submitted 2024-04-20 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords planetsstarsgiantcomparedhostingjupitersplanetstellar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

There is growing evidence from stellar kinematics and galactic chemical evolution (GCE) suggesting that giant planets (M$_{P}\geq$0.3$M_{J}$) are relatively young compared to the most commonly occurring population of small planets (M$_{P} <$0.3$M_{J}$). To further test the validity of these results, we analyzed the ages for a large number of 2336 exoplanet hosting stars determined using three different but well-established isochrone fitting models, namely, PARSEC, MIST, and Yonsei Yale (YY). As input parameters, we used Gaia DR3 parallaxes, magnitudes, and photometric temperature, as well as spectroscopically determined more accurate temperatures and metallicities from the Sweet Catalog. Our analysis suggests that $\sim$~50$\%$ to 70$\%$ of stars with planets are younger than the sun. We also find that, among the confirmed exoplanetary systems, stars hosting giant planets are even younger compared to small planet hosts. The median age of $\sim$~2.61 to 3.48~Gyr estimated for the giant planet-hosting stars (depending on the model input parameters) suggests that the later chemical enrichment of the galaxy by the iron-peak elements, largely produced from Type Ia supernovae, may have paved the way for the formation of gas giants. Furthermore, within the giant planet population itself, stars hosting hot Jupiters (orbital period $\le$10 days) are found to be younger compared to the stellar hosts of cool and warm Jupiters (orbital period $>$10 days), implying that hot Jupiters could be the youngest systems to emerge in the progression of planet formation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Where in the Milky Way Do Exoplanets Preferentially Form?

    astro-ph.EP 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using age and metallicity, the authors infer that exoplanet host stars formed at smaller Galactic radii than non-host stars, with high-mass planet hosts forming innermost and later in time.

Pith tools