Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SCHENO: Measuring Schema vs. Noise in Graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.13489 v3 pith:CLQFLVQZ submitted 2024-04-20 cs.DB

SCHENO: Measuring Schema vs. Noise in Graphs

classification cs.DB
keywords dataschemaschenographmetricnoisepatternsalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Real-world data is typically a noisy manifestation of a core pattern (schema), and the purpose of data mining algorithms is to uncover that pattern, thereby splitting (i.e. decomposing) the data into schema and noise. We introduce SCHENO, a principled evaluation metric for the goodness of a schema-noise decomposition of a graph. SCHENO captures how schematic the schema is, how noisy the noise is, and how well the combination of the two represent the original graph data. We visually demonstrate what this metric prioritizes in small graphs, then show that if SCHENO is used as the fitness function for a simple optimization strategy, we can uncover a wide variety of patterns. Finally, we evaluate several well-known graph mining algorithms with this metric; we find that although they produce patterns, those patterns are not always the best representation of the input data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TVTA: Trajectory-Aware Viseme-Guided Temporal Aggregation for Event-Based Lip Reading

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Trajectory-aware local temporal modeling before spatial aggregation plus CTC viseme supervision and EMA consistency lifts DVS-Lip word accuracy to 77.49%.