REVIEW 1 cited by
Building-PCC: Building Point Cloud Completion Benchmarks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the rapid advancement of 3D sensing technologies, obtaining 3D shape information of objects has become increasingly convenient. Lidar technology, with its capability to accurately capture the 3D information of objects at long distances, has been widely applied in the collection of 3D data in urban scenes. However, the collected point cloud data often exhibit incompleteness due to factors such as occlusion, signal absorption, and specular reflection. This paper explores the application of point cloud completion technologies in processing these incomplete data and establishes a new real-world benchmark Building-PCC dataset, to evaluate the performance of existing deep learning methods in the task of urban building point cloud completion. Through a comprehensive evaluation of different methods, we analyze the key challenges faced in building point cloud completion, aiming to promote innovation in the field of 3D geoinformation applications. Our source code is available at https://github.com/tudelft3d/Building-PCC-Building-Point-Cloud-Completion-Benchmarks.git.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Industrial3D: A Water-Treatment TLS Point Cloud Dataset and Cross-Paradigm Benchmark for MEP Scene Understanding
A 612M-point industrial MEP TLS dataset and cross-paradigm benchmark show best supervised mIoU of 55.74% versus 15.79% zero-shot Point-SAM, a 39.95-point domain gap from 215:1 imbalance and cylindrical ambiguity.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.