REVIEW 1 cited by
Beyond Deepfake Images: Detecting AI-Generated Videos
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advances in generative AI have led to the development of techniques to generate visually realistic synthetic video. While a number of techniques have been developed to detect AI-generated synthetic images, in this paper we show that synthetic image detectors are unable to detect synthetic videos. We demonstrate that this is because synthetic video generators introduce substantially different traces than those left by image generators. Despite this, we show that synthetic video traces can be learned, and used to perform reliable synthetic video detection or generator source attribution even after H.264 re-compression. Furthermore, we demonstrate that while detecting videos from new generators through zero-shot transferability is challenging, accurate detection of videos from a new generator can be achieved through few-shot learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
BrokenVideos: A Benchmark Dataset for Fine-Grained Artifact Localization in AI-Generated Videos
The paper introduces a 3,254-video benchmark with pixel-level artifact masks for AI-generated video, and reports that fine-tuning on it improves artifact localization.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.