pith. sign in

arxiv: 2404.16106 · v2 · submitted 2024-04-24 · 🪐 quant-ph

A robust approach for time-bin encoded photonic quantum information protocols

Simon J. U. White , Emanuele Polino , Farzad Ghafari , Dominick J. Joch , Luis Villegas-Aguilar , Lynden K. Shalm , Varun B. Verma , Marcus Huber
show 1 more author
Nora Tischler
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 01:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords time-bin encodingHong-Ou-Mandel interferencequantum state tomographyhigh-dimensional quantum statesphotonic quantum informationpolarization-time entanglementquantum communication
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hong-Ou-Mandel interference yields a robust protocol for generating and measuring arbitrary high-dimensional time-bin quantum states in photons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that traditional time-bin encoding in photons is hampered by optical instabilities, complex setups, and strict timing requirements, but a new method based on Hong-Ou-Mandel interference sidesteps these limits. The authors propose and experimentally demonstrate a scalable protocol that generates and measures any desired high-dimensional time-bin state. In a photonic setup they achieve high-fidelity tomography on two- and three-dimensional states whose time bins are closely spaced, and they certify polarization-time entanglement of single photons via a nonclassicality test. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach opens practical routes to high-dimensional photonic tasks that standard schemes cannot reach.

Core claim

We leverage an approach based on Hong-Ou-Mandel interference and we propose and demonstrate a robust and scalable protocol to generate and measure arbitrary high-dimensional time-bin quantum states. We experimentally implement the protocol in a photonic setup reaching high-fidelity quantum state tomographies of two and three-dimensional quantum states encoded in time-bins with short temporal separation. We also certify intrasystem polarization-time entanglement of single photons through a nonclassicality test.

What carries the argument

Hong-Ou-Mandel interference protocol that converts timing and phase information into measurable coincidence patterns for state generation and tomography.

If this is right

  • High-fidelity tomography becomes feasible for two- and three-dimensional time-bin states with short temporal separation.
  • Intrasystem polarization-time entanglement of single photons can be certified by a nonclassicality test.
  • The protocol grants access to high-dimensional states and tasks that are practically inaccessible with standard time-bin schemes.
  • The method supports scalable generation and measurement of arbitrary high-dimensional time-bin quantum states.
  • Applications in quantum communication become feasible for protocols that rely on these states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the method extends cleanly to four or more dimensions, it could support larger alphabets for quantum key distribution without added hardware complexity.
  • The same interference technique might be combined with existing polarization or path encoding to create hybrid high-dimensional resources.
  • Because the protocol avoids long delay lines, it could be integrated into compact on-chip photonic circuits for time-bin processing.
  • Demonstrations with multiple photons would test whether the approach scales to entangled time-bin states across separate particles.

Load-bearing premise

Hong-Ou-Mandel interference can be harnessed to avoid the optical instabilities, complex setups, and timing-resolution demands that restrict conventional time-bin methods.

What would settle it

A direct comparison experiment in which the same short-separation time-bin states are prepared and measured both with the proposed interference method and with a standard unbalanced-interferometer scheme, showing whether fidelity remains high only in the former case.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2404.16106 by Dominick J. Joch, Emanuele Polino, Farzad Ghafari, Luis Villegas-Aguilar, Lynden K. Shalm, Marcus Huber, Nora Tischler, Simon J. U. White, Varun B. Verma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Conceptual scheme of HOM-based measurement. The unknown target photon is measured by means of a known and controlled reference photon via HOM interference at a beam splitter (BS). From the coincidence counts, one can deduce the projection value. Measurement scheme — The goal here is to use HOM in￾terference to perform arbitrary projective measurements on an unknown target time-bin encoded quantum state [P… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Experimental results. a) Experimentally reconstructed mixed states (red) and theoretical expectations (blue) on the Bloch sphere. Insets: Examples for real parts of density matri￾ces. b) Expectation values of the correlators measured for the noncontextuality test of single-photon time-polarization hybrid entangled states. Dashed lines: ideal values for a singlet state and optimal measurements. Error bars a… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum states encoded in the time-bin degree of freedom of photons represent a fundamental resource for quantum information protocols. Traditional methods for generating and measuring time-bin encoded quantum states face severe challenges due to optical instabilities, complex setups, and timing resolution requirements. To circumvent these issues, we leverage an approach based on Hong-Ou-Mandel interference and we propose and demonstrate a robust and scalable protocol to generate and measure arbitrary high-dimensional time-bin quantum states. We experimentally implement the protocol in a photonic setup reaching high-fidelity quantum state tomographies of two and three-dimensional quantum states encoded in time-bins with short temporal separation. We also certify intrasystem polarization-time entanglement of single photons through a nonclassicality test. The demonstrated approach enables access to high-dimensional states and tasks that are practically inaccessible with standard schemes, thereby advancing fundamental quantum information science and opening applications in quantum communication.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes and experimentally demonstrates a protocol based on Hong-Ou-Mandel interference for generating and measuring arbitrary high-dimensional time-bin encoded quantum states in photons. It claims this approach circumvents optical instabilities and timing issues of traditional methods, reports high-fidelity quantum state tomographies for two- and three-dimensional states with short temporal separation, and certifies intrasystem polarization-time entanglement of single photons via a nonclassicality test.

Significance. If substantiated by data and methods, the protocol could enable practical access to high-dimensional time-bin states for quantum information tasks that are currently limited by setup complexity, potentially advancing photonic quantum communication and fundamental tests. The abstract positions the work as scalable and robust but supplies no quantitative results or validation details.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central experimental claim of 'high-fidelity quantum state tomographies' for 2D and 3D states is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet the abstract provides no fidelity values, error bars, raw data, or comparison to standard schemes, preventing any assessment of whether the HOM-based method actually delivers the claimed robustness.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'short temporal separation' is used without a numerical scale or reference to typical timing resolution limits, which would help contextualize the advantage over traditional methods.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comment on the abstract. We address it point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central experimental claim of 'high-fidelity quantum state tomographies' for 2D and 3D states is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet the abstract provides no fidelity values, error bars, raw data, or comparison to standard schemes, preventing any assessment of whether the HOM-based method actually delivers the claimed robustness.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should be more self-contained and quantitative. The full manuscript contains the fidelity values (with error bars), raw data, and comparisons to standard schemes for the 2D and 3D tomographies. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to include the specific fidelity numbers and uncertainties for both dimensionalities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detectable; abstract contains no derivations

full rationale

The full text provided is limited to the abstract, which contains no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or mathematical claims of any kind. The text describes an experimental implementation of a protocol leveraging Hong-Ou-Mandel interference for time-bin encoded states but offers no load-bearing steps, self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems that could reduce to their own inputs. Without any derivation chain present, no circularity patterns can be identified, and the paper's central claim remains an experimental report rather than a self-referential theoretical result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5683 in / 1017 out tokens · 21121 ms · 2026-05-24T01:28:35.767621+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 101 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Slussarenko and G

    S. Slussarenko and G. J. Pryde, Applied Physics Reviews 6, 041303 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Flamini, N

    F. Flamini, N. Spagnolo, and F. Sciarrino, Reports on Progress in Physics 82, 016001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    J. D. Franson, Physical Review Letters 62, 2205 (1989)

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    De Riedmatten, I

    H. De Riedmatten, I. Marcikic, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Quantum Information & Computation 2, 425 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    P . C. Humphreys, B. J. Metcalf, J. B. Spring, M. Moore, X.- M. Jin, M. Barbieri, W. S. Kolthammer, and I. A. Walmsley, Physical Review Letters 111, 150501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Martin, T

    A. Martin, T. Guerreiro, A. Tiranov, S. Designolle, F. Fr¨owis, N. Brunner, M. Huber, and N. Gisin, Physical Review Letters 118, 110501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Erhard, M

    M. Erhard, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 365 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Tittel, J

    W. Tittel, J. Brendel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Physical Review Letters 81, 3563 (1998)

    work page 1998

  9. [9]

    Marcikic, H

    I. Marcikic, H. De Riedmatten, W. Tittel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Nature 421, 509 (2003)

    work page 2003

  10. [10]

    Marcikic, H

    I. Marcikic, H. De Riedmatten, W. Tittel, H. Zbinden, M. Legr´e, and N. Gisin, Physical Review Letters 93, 180502 (2004)

    work page 2004

  11. [11]

    Cuevas, G

    A. Cuevas, G. Carvacho, G. Saavedra, J. Cari ˜ne, W. Nogueira, M. Figueroa, A. Cabello, P . Mataloni, G. Lima, and G. Xavier, Nature Communications 4, 2871 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Sun, Y.-L

    Q.-C. Sun, Y.-L. Mao, S.-J. Chen, W. Zhang, Y.-F. Jiang, Y.-B. Zhang, W.-J. Zhang, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, H. Terai, et al., Nature Photonics 10, 671 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Schmitt-Manderbach, H

    T. Schmitt-Manderbach, H. Weier, M. F ¨urst, R. Ursin, F. Tiefenbacher, T. Scheidl, J. Perdigues, Z. Sodnik, C. Kurt- siefer, J. G. Rarity, et al., Physical Review Letters 98, 010504 (2007)

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    Ursin, F

    R. Ursin, F. Tiefenbacher, T. Schmitt-Manderbach, H. Weier, T. Scheidl, M. Lindenthal, B. Blauensteiner, T. Jennewein, J. Perdigues, P . Trojek,et al., Nature Physics 3, 481 (2007)

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    Fedrizzi, R

    A. Fedrizzi, R. Ursin, T. Herbst, M. Nespoli, R. Prevedel, T. Scheidl, F. Tiefenbacher, T. Jennewein, and A. Zeilinger, Nature Physics 5, 389 (2009)

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Jin, J.-G

    X.-M. Jin, J.-G. Ren, B. Yang, Z.-H. Yi, F. Zhou, X.-F. Xu, S.- K. Wang, D. Yang, Y.-F. Hu, S. Jiang,et al., Nature Photonics 4, 376 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    Steinlechner, S

    F. Steinlechner, S. Ecker, M. Fink, B. Liu, J. Bavaresco, M. Huber, T. Scheidl, and R. Ursin, Nature Communica- tions 8, 15971 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Vallone, D

    G. Vallone, D. Dequal, M. Tomasin, F. Vedovato, M. Schi- avon, V . Luceri, G. Bianco, and P . Villoresi, Physical Review Letters 116, 253601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    J. S. Sidhu, S. K. Joshi, M. G ¨undo˘gan, T. Brougham, D. Lowndes, L. Mazzarella, M. Krutzik, S. Mohapatra, D. Dequal, G. Vallone, et al., IET Quantum Communication 2, 182 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Brendel, N

    J. Brendel, N. Gisin, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Physical Review Letters 82, 2594 (1999)

    work page 1999

  21. [21]

    Tittel, J

    W. Tittel, J. Brendel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Physical Review Letters 84, 4737 (2000)

    work page 2000

  22. [22]

    Gisin and R

    N. Gisin and R. Thew, Nature Photonics 1, 165 (2007)

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Zhong, H

    T. Zhong, H. Zhou, R. D. Horansky, C. Lee, V . B. Verma, A. E. Lita, A. Restelli, J. C. Bienfang, R. P . Mirin, T. Gerrits, et al., New Journal of Physics 17, 022002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    N. T. Islam, C. C. W. Lim, C. Cahall, J. Kim, and D. J. Gauthier, Science Advances 3, e1701491 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Cozzolino, B

    D. Cozzolino, B. Da Lio, D. Bacco, and L. K. Oxenløwe, Advanced Quantum Technologies 2, 1900038 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Fitzke, L

    E. Fitzke, L. Bialowons, T. Dolejsky, M. Tippmann, O. Niki- forov, T. Walther, F. Wissel, and M. Gunkel, PRX Quantum 3, 020341 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Bergmayr, F

    A. Bergmayr, F. Kanitschar, M. Pivoluska, and M. Huber, (2023), arXiv:2308.04422 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Valivarthi, S

    R. Valivarthi, S. I. Davis, C. Pe ˜na, S. Xie, N. Lauk, L. Narv ´aez, J. P . Allmaras, A. D. Beyer, Y. Gim, M. Hussein, et al., PRX Quantum 1, 020317 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    W. Wen, Z. Chen, L. Lu, W. Yan, W. Xue, P . Zhang, Y. Lu, S. Zhu, and X.-s. Ma, Physical Review Applied 18, 024059 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    F. Xu, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, H.-K. Lo, and J.-W. Pan, Reviews of Modern Physics 92, 025002 (2020). 6

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Diamanti, H.-K

    E. Diamanti, H.-K. Lo, B. Qi, and Z. Yuan, npj Quantum Information 2, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Takesue and Y

    H. Takesue and Y. Noguchi, Optics Express 17, 10976 (2009)

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Vedovato, C

    F. Vedovato, C. Agnesi, M. Tomasin, M. Avesani, J.-˚A. Lars- son, G. Vallone, and P . Villoresi, Physical Review Letters 121, 190401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Esmaeil Zadeh, J

    I. Esmaeil Zadeh, J. W. Los, R. Gourgues, V . Steinmetz, G. Bulgarini, S. M. Dobrovolskiy, V . Zwiller, and S. N. Dorenbos, APL Photonics 2, 111301 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Korzh, Q.-Y

    B. Korzh, Q.-Y. Zhao, J. P . Allmaras, S. Frasca, T. M. Autry, E. A. Bersin, A. D. Beyer, R. M. Briggs, B. Bumble, M. Colan- gelo, et al., Nature Photonics 14, 250 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    G. G. Taylor, E. N. MacKenzie, B. Korzh, D. V . Morozov, B. Bumble, A. D. Beyer, J. P . Allmaras, M. D. Shaw, and R. H. Hadfield, Applied Physics Letters 121, 214001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Hao, Q.-Y

    H. Hao, Q.-Y. Zhao, Y.-H. Huang, J. Deng, F. Yang, S.-Y. Ru, Z. Liu, C. Wan, H. Liu, Z.-J. Li, et al., Light: Science & Applications 13, 25 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Pe’Er, B

    A. Pe’Er, B. Dayan, A. A. Friesem, and Y. Silberberg, Phys- ical Review Letters 94, 073601 (2005)

    work page 2005

  40. [40]

    Kuzucu, F

    O. Kuzucu, F. N. Wong, S. Kurimura, and S. Tovstonog, Optics Letters 33, 2257 (2008)

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    J. M. Donohue, M. Agnew, J. Lavoie, and K. J. Resch, Physical Review Letters 111, 153602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    J.-P . W. MacLean, J. M. Donohue, and K. J. Resch, Physical Review Letters 120, 053601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Bouchard, D

    F. Bouchard, D. England, P . J. Bustard, K. Heshami, and B. Sussman, PRX Quantum 3, 010332 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Bouchard, K

    F. Bouchard, K. Bonsma-Fisher, K. Heshami, P . J. Bustard, D. England, and B. Sussman, Physical Review A 107, 022618 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Experimental high-dimensional entangle- ment certification and quantum steering with time-energy measurements,

    K.-C. Chang, M. C. Sarihan, X. Cheng, P . Erker, A. Mueller, M. Spiropulu, M. D. Shaw, B. Korzh, M. Huber, and C. W. Wong, “Experimental high-dimensional entangle- ment certification and quantum steering with time-energy measurements,” (2023), arXiv:2310.20694 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Hong, Z.-Y

    C.-K. Hong, Z.-Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Physical Review Letters 59, 2044 (1987)

    work page 2044

  47. [47]

    Bouchard, A

    F. Bouchard, A. Sit, Y. Zhang, R. Fickler, F. M. Miatto, Y. Yao, F. Sciarrino, and E. Karimi, Reports on Progress in Physics 84, 012402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    J. C. Garcia-Escartin and P . Chamorro-Posada, Physical Review A 87, 052330 (2013)

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    Tsujimoto, R

    Y. Tsujimoto, R. Ikuta, K. Wakui, T. Kobayashi, and M. Fu- jiwara, Physical Review Applied 19, 014008 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    G. P . Tempor˜ao, P . Ripper, T. B. Guerreiro, and G. C. do Amaral, Phys. Rev. A 109, 022402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Pilnyak, P

    Y. Pilnyak, P . Zilber, L. Cohen, and H. S. Eisenberg, Physi- cal Review A 100, 043826 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    D. F. James, P . G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro, and A. G. White, Physical Review A 64, 052312 (2001)

    work page 2001

  53. [53]

    Jozsa, Journal of Modern Optics 41, 2315 (1994)

    R. Jozsa, Journal of Modern Optics 41, 2315 (1994)

    work page 1994

  54. [54]

    Shen and C

    Y. Shen and C. Rosales-Guzm ´an, Laser & Photonics Re- views 16, 2100533 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    B. N. Simon, S. Simon, F. Gori, M. Santarsiero, R. Borghi, N. Mukunda, and R. Simon, Physical Review Letters 104, 023901 (2010)

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    J. H. Eberly, X.-F. Qian, A. Al Qasimi, H. Ali, M. Alonso, R. Guti´errez-Cuevas, B. J. Little, J. C. Howell, T. Malhotra, and A. Vamivakas, Physica Scripta 91, 063003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    Azzini, S

    S. Azzini, S. Mazzucchi, V . Moretti, D. Pastorello, and L. Pavesi, Advanced Quantum Technologies 3, 2000014 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Forbes and I

    A. Forbes and I. Nape, AVS Quantum Science 1, 011701 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Karimi, J

    E. Karimi, J. Leach, S. Slussarenko, B. Piccirillo, L. Marrucci, L. Chen, W. She, S. Franke-Arnold, M. J. Padgett, and E. Santamato, Physical Review A 82, 022115 (2010)

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    Karimi, F

    E. Karimi, F. Cardano, M. Maffei, C. de Lisio, L. Marrucci, R. W. Boyd, and E. Santamato, Physical Review A 89, 032122 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    McLaren, T

    M. McLaren, T. Konrad, and A. Forbes, Physical Review A 92, 023833 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    D’Ambrosio, G

    V . D’Ambrosio, G. Carvacho, F. Graffitti, C. Vitelli, B. Pic- cirillo, L. Marrucci, and F. Sciarrino, Physical Review A 94, 030304 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Milione, T

    G. Milione, T. A. Nguyen, J. Leach, D. A. Nolan, and R. R. Alfano, Optics Letters 40, 4887 (2015)

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    Cozzolino, E

    D. Cozzolino, E. Polino, M. Valeri, G. Carvacho, D. Bacco, N. Spagnolo, L. K. Oxenløwe, and F. Sciarrino, Advanced Photonics 1, 046005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Suprano, D

    A. Suprano, D. Zia, M. Pont, T. Giordani, G. Rodari, M. Va- leri, B. Piccirillo, G. Carvacho, N. Spagnolo, P . Senellart, et al., Advanced Photonics 5, 046008 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Michler, H

    M. Michler, H. Weinfurter, and M. ˙Zukowski, Physical Review Letters 84, 5457 (2000)

    work page 2000

  67. [67]

    Gadway, E

    B. Gadway, E. Galvez, and F. De Zela, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 42, 015503 (2008)

    work page 2008

  68. [68]

    R. F. Werner, Physical Review A 40, 4277 (1989)

    work page 1989

  69. [69]

    Brunner, N

    N. Brunner, N. Gisin, and V . Scarani, New Journal of Physics 7, 88 (2005)

    work page 2005

  70. [70]

    Villegas-Aguilar, E

    L. Villegas-Aguilar, E. Polino, F. Ghafari, M. T. Quintino, K. T. Laverick, I. R. Berkman, S. Rogge, L. K. Shalm, N. Tis- chler, E. G. Cavalcanti, et al., Nature Communications 15, 3112 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Khrennikov, Foundations of Physics 50, 1762 (2020)

    A. Khrennikov, Foundations of Physics 50, 1762 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    Kochen and E

    S. Kochen and E. P . Specker, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17, 59 (1967)

    work page 1967

  73. [73]

    Budroni, A

    C. Budroni, A. Cabello, O. G ¨uhne, M. Kleinmann, and J.- ˚A. Larsson, Reviews of Modern Physics 94, 045007 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Paneru, E

    D. Paneru, E. Cohen, R. Fickler, R. W. Boyd, and E. Karimi, Reports on Progress in Physics 83, 064001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Physical Review Letters 23, 880 (1969)

    work page 1969

  76. [76]

    Innocenti, H

    L. Innocenti, H. Majury, T. Giordani, N. Spagnolo, F. Sciar- rino, M. Paternostro, and A. Ferraro, Physical Review A 96, 062326 (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    Giordani, E

    T. Giordani, E. Polino, S. Emiliani, A. Suprano, L. Inno- centi, H. Majury, L. Marrucci, M. Paternostro, A. Ferraro, N. Spagnolo, et al., Physical Review Letters 122, 020503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    Suprano, D

    A. Suprano, D. Zia, E. Polino, T. Giordani, L. Innocenti, A. Ferraro, M. Paternostro, N. Spagnolo, and F. Sciarrino, Advanced Photonics 3, 066002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    Esposito, F

    C. Esposito, F. Di Colandrea, F. Hoch, G. Carvacho, F. Car- dano, N. Spagnolo, L. Marrucci, and F. Sciarrino, Physical Review Research 5, 043025 (2023)

    work page 2023

  80. [80]

    Aharonov, L

    Y. Aharonov, L. Davidovich, and N. Zagury, Physical Review A 48, 1687 (1993)

    work page 1993

Showing first 80 references.