pith. sign in

arxiv: 2404.16676 · v2 · pith:MZ47T2TGnew · submitted 2024-04-25 · 💻 cs.DS · cs.LG

Multilayer Correlation Clustering

Atsushi Miyauchi , Florian Adriaens , Francesco Bonchi , Nikolaj Tatti This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 02:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.DS cs.LG
keywords multilayer correlation clusteringapproximation algorithmscorrelation clusteringℓ_p-normprobability constraintgraph clusteringmultilayer graphs
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multilayer Correlation Clustering minimizes the ℓ_p-norm of a disagreements vector across layers and admits O(L log n) and 4-approximations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines a new problem that takes multiple correlation-clustering instances, each called a layer, on the same vertex set and seeks one clustering whose quality is measured by the ℓ_p-norm of the vector of per-layer disagreements. This produces a single partition that trades off errors across all inputs rather than optimizing any one layer in isolation. The authors give an O(L log n)-approximation for the general case and, for the probability-constraint special case, both an (α+2)-approximation that uses any single-layer algorithm and a direct 4-approximation that improves the 4.5 ratio. Readers care because many data sets arrive as several noisy or partial views that must be reconciled into one clustering. Experiments on real data sets are reported to support the guarantees.

Core claim

We establish Multilayer Correlation Clustering, a novel generalization of Correlation Clustering to the multilayer setting. In this model, we are given a series of inputs of Correlation Clustering (called layers) over the common set V of n elements. The goal is to find a clustering of V that minimizes the ℓ_p-norm (p≥1) of the multilayer-disagreements vector, which is defined as the vector (with dimension equal to the number of layers), each element of which represents the disagreements of the clustering on the corresponding layer. For this generalization, we first design an O(L log n)-approximation algorithm, where L is the number of layers. We then study an important special case of our问题,

What carries the argument

The multilayer-disagreements vector whose entries count disagreements on each layer; the objective minimizes its ℓ_p-norm.

If this is right

  • An O(L log n)-approximation algorithm solves the general multilayer problem.
  • Any α-approximation for single-layer correlation clustering yields an (α+2)-approximation for the probability-constraint multilayer version.
  • A 4-approximation exists for the probability-constraint case, improving on the 4.5 ratio obtained from the general reduction.
  • Computational experiments on real-world data sets confirm that the algorithms are practical.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reduction technique could be applied to other multi-objective clustering objectives not studied in the paper.
  • The model supplies a concrete way to reconcile multiple graph views when each view supplies its own similarity or dissimilarity judgments.
  • The O(L log n) dependence suggests that the method remains tractable when the number of layers grows slowly compared with the number of vertices.

Load-bearing premise

The layers are independent inputs over a shared vertex set and the ℓ_p-norm of their disagreement counts is the right way to combine them.

What would settle it

An instance with two layers under the probability constraint where every clustering produces a disagreements vector whose ℓ_p-norm is more than four times the optimum would disprove the 4-approximation.

read the original abstract

We establish Multilayer Correlation Clustering, a novel generalization of Correlation Clustering to the multilayer setting. In this model, we are given a series of inputs of Correlation Clustering (called layers) over the common set $V$ of $n$ elements. The goal is to find a clustering of $V$ that minimizes the $\ell_p$-norm ($p\geq 1$) of the multilayer-disagreements vector, which is defined as the vector (with dimension equal to the number of layers), each element of which represents the disagreements of the clustering on the corresponding layer. For this generalization, we first design an $O(L\log n)$-approximation algorithm, where $L$ is the number of layers. We then study an important special case of our problem, namely the problem with the so-called probability constraint. For this case, we first give an $(\alpha+2)$-approximation algorithm, where $\alpha$ is any possible approximation ratio for the single-layer counterpart. Furthermore, we design a $4$-approximation algorithm, which improves the above approximation ratio of $\alpha+2=4.5$ for the general probability-constraint case. Computational experiments using real-world datasets support our theoretical findings and demonstrate the practical effectiveness of our proposed algorithms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Multilayer Correlation Clustering, a generalization of correlation clustering in which L layers of correlation-clustering instances are defined on a common vertex set V of size n. The objective is to produce a single clustering of V that minimizes the ℓ_p-norm (p ≥ 1) of the L-dimensional vector whose i-th coordinate is the number of disagreements on layer i. The authors present an O(L log n)-approximation algorithm for the general case, an (α + 2)-approximation (α any single-layer approximation ratio) for the probability-constrained variant, and a 4-approximation that improves the preceding bound when α = 2.5. The claims are accompanied by a theoretical analysis and by computational experiments on real-world data sets.

Significance. If the stated approximation guarantees hold, the work supplies the first non-trivial approximation algorithms for a natural multilayer extension of correlation clustering, a problem with applications in social-network analysis and multi-view data clustering. The explicit improvement from α + 2 to a constant 4-approximation for the probability-constrained case is a concrete algorithmic contribution. The inclusion of experimental validation on real data is a positive feature that supports practical relevance.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§1] §1, paragraph following the problem definition: the precise definition of the multilayer-disagreement vector (including how disagreements are counted when edges are absent from a layer) should be stated formally before the objective is introduced.
  2. The probability-constraint case is introduced without an explicit equation number; adding a numbered definition (e.g., Eq. (3)) would make subsequent references to the constraint clearer.
  3. Table 1 (or the experimental-results table): the column headings should explicitly indicate whether the reported values are objective values or approximation ratios relative to the best known solution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of our manuscript, accurate summary of the contributions, and recommendation for minor revision. We are pleased that the significance of the multilayer correlation clustering problem and the algorithmic results (including the O(L log n)-approximation, the probability-constrained variants, and the experimental validation) were recognized.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; algorithmic analysis is self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines a new multilayer objective (ℓ_p-norm of per-layer disagreement vector) directly from the input layers and common vertex set. It then constructs approximation algorithms whose ratios are derived from standard single-layer correlation clustering results (α) or explicit combinatorial arguments (O(L log n), 4-approx). No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction; no self-citation chain is invoked to justify uniqueness or an ansatz; the derivation does not reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. This is a standard theoretical CS contribution with independent algorithmic content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard techniques from approximation algorithms for correlation clustering; no free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are indicated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5754 in / 1133 out tokens · 17996 ms · 2026-05-24T02:36:52.462981+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.03508 , year=

    S. Ahmadi, S. Galhotra, B. Saha, and R. Schwartz. Fair cor relation clustering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.03508, 2020

    work page arXiv 2002

  2. [2]

    Ahmadi, S

    S. Ahmadi, S. Khuller, and B. Saha. Min-max correlation c lustering via MultiCut. In IPCO ’19: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatori al Optimization, pages 13–26, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Ahmadian, A

    S. Ahmadian, A. Epasto, R. Kumar, and M. Mahdian. Fair cor relation clustering. In AISTATS ’20: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Artificial Intellig ence and Statistics, pages 4195–4205, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Ahmadian and M

    S. Ahmadian and M. Negahbani. Improved approximation fo r fair correlation clustering. In AISTATS ’23: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Artific ial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 9499–9516, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Ailon, M

    N. Ailon, M. Charikar, and A. Newman. Aggregating incons istent information: Ranking and clustering. Journal of the ACM, 55(5), 2008. 21

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Bansal, A

    N. Bansal, A. Blum, and S. Chawla. Correlation clusterin g. In FOCS ’02: Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Annual Symposium on F oundations of Computer Science, pages 238–247, 2002

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    Bansal, A

    N. Bansal, A. Blum, and S. Chawla. Correlation clusterin g. Machine learning, 56:89–113, 2004

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Basaras, G

    P . Basaras, G. Iosifidis, D. Katsaros, and L. Tassiulas. I dentifying influential spreaders in complex multilayer networks: A centrality perspective. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering , 6(1):31–45, 2019

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Bazzi, M

    M. Bazzi, M. A. Porter, S. Williams, M. McDonald, D. J. Fen n, and S. D. Howison. Community detection in temporal multilayer networks, with an application to corre lation networks. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation , 14(1):1–41, 2016

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Bhangale and S

    A. Bhangale and S. Khot. Simultaneous Max-Cut is harder to approximate than Max-Cut. In CCC ’20: Pro- ceedings of the 35th Computational Complexity Conference , pages 9:1–9:15, 2020

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Bhangale, S

    A. Bhangale, S. Khot, S. Kopparty, S. Sachdeva, and D. Th iruvenkatachari. Near-optimal approximation algo- rithm for simultaneous M AX-C UT. In SODA ’18: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM–SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 1407–1425, 2018

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Bonchi, D

    F. Bonchi, D. Garc´ ıa-Soriano, and F. Gullo. Correlation Clustering, volume 19 of Synthesis Lectures on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery . Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2022

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Bonchi, A

    F. Bonchi, A. Gionis, F. Gullo, C. E. Tsourakakis, and A. Ukkonen. Chromatic correlation clustering. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data , 9(4), 2015

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Bonchi, A

    F. Bonchi, A. Gionis, F. Gullo, and A. Ukkonen. Chromati c correlation clustering. In KDD ’12: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge D iscovery and Data Mining , page 1321–1329, 2012

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Charikar, N

    M. Charikar, N. Gupta, and R. Schwartz. Local guarantee s in graph cuts and clustering. In IPCO ’17: Proceed- ings of the 19th Conference on Integer Programming and Combi natorial Optimization, pages 136–147, 2017

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Charikar, V

    M. Charikar, V . Guruswami, and A. Wirth. Clustering wit h qualitative information. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 71(3):360–383, 2005

    work page 2005

  17. [17]

    Chawla, K

    S. Chawla, K. Makarychev, T. Schramm, and G. Y aroslavts ev. Near optimal LP rounding algorithm for correla- tion clustering on complete and complete k-partite graphs. In STOC ’15: Proceedings of the 47th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing , page 219–228, 2015

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Y . Chen, A. Jalali, S. Sanghavi, and H. Xu. Clustering pa rtially observed graphs via convex optimization. The Journal of Machine Learning Research , 15(1):2213–2238, 2014

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Cohen-Addad, E

    V . Cohen-Addad, E. Lee, S. Li, and A. Newman. Handling co rrelated rounding error via preclustering: A 1.73- approximation for correlation clustering. In FOCS ’23: Proceedings of the 64th IEEE Annual Symposium on F oundations of Computer Science, pages 1082–1104, 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Cohen-Addad, E

    V . Cohen-Addad, E. Lee, and A. Newman. Correlation clus tering with Sherali-Adams. In FOCS ’22: Proceed- ings of the 63rd IEEE Annual Symposium on F oundations of Comp uter Science, pages 651–661, 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Davies, B

    S. Davies, B. Moseley, and H. Newman. Fast combinatoria l algorithms for min max correlation clustering. In ICML ’23: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 7205–7230, 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    De Bacco, E

    C. De Bacco, E. A. Power, D. B. Larremore, and C. Moore. Co mmunity detection, link prediction, and layer interdependence in multilayer networks. Physical Review E, 95:042317, 2017

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    De Domenico, C

    M. De Domenico, C. Granell, M. A. Porter, and A. Arenas. T he physics of spreading processes in multilayer networks. Nature Physics, 12(10):901–906, 2016. 22

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    De Domenico, A

    M. De Domenico, A. Sol´ e-Ribalta, E. Omodei, S. G´ omez,and A. Arenas. Ranking in interconnected multilayer networks reveals versatile nodes. Nature Communications, 6:6868, 2015

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    E. D. Demaine, D. Emanuel, A. Fiat, and N. Immorlica. Cor relation clustering in general weighted graphs. Theoretical Computer Science, 361(2):172–187, 2006

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    X. Z. Fern and C. E. Brodley. Random projection for high d imensional data clustering: A cluster ensemble approach. In ICML ’03: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 186– 193, 2003

    work page 2003

  27. [27]

    Friggstad and R

    Z. Friggstad and R. Mousavi. Fair correlation clusteri ng with global and local guarantees. In WADS ’21: Pro- ceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures, pages 414–427, 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Galimberti, F

    E. Galimberti, F. Bonchi, F. Gullo, and T. Lanciano. Cor e decomposition in multilayer networks: Theory, algorithms, and applications. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data , 14(1), 2020

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    N. Garg, V . V . V azirani, and M. Y annakakis. Approximatemax-flow min-(multi)cut theorems and their applica- tions. SIAM Journal on Computing , 25(2):235–251, 1996

    work page 1996

  30. [30]

    Gionis, H

    A. Gionis, H. Mannila, and P . Tsaparas. Clustering aggr egation. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 1(1), 2007

    work page 2007

  31. [31]

    Gr¨ otschel and Y

    M. Gr¨ otschel and Y . Wakabayashi. A cutting plane algorithm for a clustering problem. Mathematical Program- ming, 45:59–96, 1989

    work page 1989

  32. [32]

    Heidrich, J

    H. Heidrich, J. Irmai, and B. Andres. A 4-approximation algorithm for min max correlation clustering. In AISTATS ’24: Proceedings of the 27th International Confere nce on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 1945–1953, 2024

    work page 1945

  33. [33]

    Interdonato, A

    R. Interdonato, A. Tagarelli, D. Ienco, A. Sallaberry, and P . Poncelet. Local community detection in multilayer networks. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 31(5):1444–1479, 2017

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Jalili, Y

    M. Jalili, Y . Orouskhani, M. Asgari, N. Alipourfard, an d M. Perc. Link prediction in multiplex online social networks. Royal Society Open Science , 4(2):160863, 2017

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Jethava and N

    V . Jethava and N. Beerenwinkel. Finding dense subgraph s in relational graphs. In ECML PKDD ’15: Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Disc overy in Databases , pages 641–654, 2015

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Joachims and J

    T. Joachims and J. Hopcroft. Error bounds for correlati on clustering. In ICML ’05: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning , page 385–392, 2005

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    Kalhan, K

    S. Kalhan, K. Makarychev, and T. Zhou. Correlation clus tering with local objectives. In NeurIPS ’19: Proceed- ings of the 33rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Pro cessing Systems, pages 9341–9350, 2019

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Kawase, A

    Y . Kawase, A. Miyauchi, and H. Sumita. Stochastic solut ions for dense subgraph discovery in multilayer net- works. In WSDM ’23: Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Confere nce on W eb Search and Data Mining, page 886–894, 2023

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Klodt, L

    N. Klodt, L. Seifert, A. Zahn, K. Casel, D. Issac, and T. F riedrich. A color-blind 3-approximation for chromatic correlation clustering and improved heuristics. In KDD ’21: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , page 882–891, 2021

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Kuroki, A

    Y . Kuroki, A. Miyauchi, F. Bonchi, and W . Chen. Query-efficient correlation clustering with noisy oracle. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01400, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Makarychev, Y

    K. Makarychev, Y . Makarychev, and A. Vijayaraghavan. C orrelation clustering with noisy partial information. In COLT ’15: Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Learning The ory, pages 1321–1342, 2015. 23

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Mathieu and W

    C. Mathieu and W . Schudy. Correlation clustering with n oisy input. In SODA ’10: Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM–SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms , pages 712–728, 2010

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Puleo and O

    G. Puleo and O. Milenkovic. Correlation clustering and biclustering with locally bounded errors. In ICML ’16: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machin e Learning, pages 869–877, 2016

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    G. J. Puleo and O. Milenkovic. Correlation clustering a nd biclustering with locally bounded errors. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 64(6):4105–4119, 2018

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Salehi, R

    M. Salehi, R. Sharma, M. Marzolla, M. Magnani, P . Siyari , and D. Montesi. Spreading processes in multilayer networks. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering , 2(2):65–83, 2015

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Schwartz and R

    R. Schwartz and R. Zats. Fair correlation clustering in general graphs. In APPROX/RANDOM ’22: Proceedings of the International Conference on Approximation Algorith ms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems and the International Conference on Randomization and Computatio n, pages 37:1–37:19, 2022

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Strehl and J

    A. Strehl and J. Ghosh. Cluster ensembles — A knowledge r euse framework for combining multiple partitions. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 3:583–617, 2002

    work page 2002

  48. [48]

    Tagarelli, A

    A. Tagarelli, A. Amelio, and F. Gullo. Ensemble-based c ommunity detection in multilayer networks. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 31(5):1506–1543, 2017. 24

    work page 2017