Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Common Core Ontologies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.17758 v2 pith:ENQDFCCO submitted 2024-04-27 cs.AI cs.DBcs.LO

Mark Jensen , Giacomo De Colle , Sean Kindya , Cameron More , Alexander P. Cox , John Beverley This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AIcs.DBcs.LO
keywords ontologycommoncoremid-levelontologiessuitebeencontents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Common Core Ontologies (CCO) are designed as a mid-level ontology suite that extends the Basic Formal Ontology. CCO has since been increasingly adopted by a broad group of users and applications and is proposed as the first standard mid-level ontology. Despite these successes, documentation of the contents and design patterns of the CCO has been comparatively minimal. This paper is a step toward providing enhanced documentation for the mid-level ontology suite through a discussion of the contents of the eleven ontologies that collectively comprise the Common Core Ontology suite.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ontology Enabled Hybrid Modeling and Simulation

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A review proposing that separating 'what is modeled' from 'how it is modeled' ontologies improves hybrid simulation interoperability and reusability.

Pith tools