Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

BiomedRAG: A Retrieval Augmented Large Language Model for Biomedicine

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.00465 v3 pith:WNPIPMH5 submitted 2024-05-01 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords extractionbiomedragmodelsbiomedicalinformationlanguageretrievalretrieved
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have swiftly emerged as vital resources for different applications in the biomedical and healthcare domains; however, these models encounter issues such as generating inaccurate information or hallucinations. Retrieval-augmented generation provided a solution for these models to update knowledge and enhance their performance. In contrast to previous retrieval-augmented LMs, which utilize specialized cross-attention mechanisms to help LLM encode retrieved text, BiomedRAG adopts a simpler approach by directly inputting the retrieved chunk-based documents into the LLM. This straightforward design is easily applicable to existing retrieval and language models, effectively bypassing noise information in retrieved documents, particularly in noise-intensive tasks. Moreover, we demonstrate the potential for utilizing the LLM to supervise the retrieval model in the biomedical domain, enabling it to retrieve the document that assists the LM in improving its predictions. Our experiments reveal that with the tuned scorer,\textsc{ BiomedRAG} attains superior performance across 5 biomedical NLP tasks, encompassing information extraction (triple extraction, relation extraction), text classification, link prediction, and question-answering, leveraging over 9 datasets. For instance, in the triple extraction task, \textsc{BiomedRAG} outperforms other triple extraction systems with micro-F1 scores of 81.42 and 88.83 on GIT and ChemProt corpora, respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RAG-WM: An Efficient Black-Box Watermarking Approach for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RAG-WM embeds HMAC-generated entity-relation watermarks into a RAG knowledge base and detects stolen RAGs via black-box queries with a binomial test, showing high success across four LLMs and five datasets.

  2. RARE: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning Enhancement for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding retrieval-augmented actions and a retrieval-based factuality scorer to the rStar tree-search framework improves accuracy on six medical and commonsense QA benchmarks, reportedly matching or beating GPT-4o on se...

  3. GraPPI: A Retrieve-Divide-Solve GraphRAG Framework for Large-scale Protein-protein Interaction Exploration

    q-bio.QM 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A knowledge-graph-based RAG framework that splits PPI pathway exploration into edge-level subtasks and returns ranked, explained pathways from the STRING interaction database.

Pith tools