Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Math Multiple Choice Question Generation via Human-Large Language Model Collaboration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.00864 v1 pith:CNUBKYUW submitted 2024-05-01 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords mathcollaborationeducatorsgenerationllmsmcqsprocesschoice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are a popular method for evaluating students' knowledge due to their efficiency in administration and grading. Crafting high-quality math MCQs is a labor-intensive process that requires educators to formulate precise stems and plausible distractors. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have sparked interest in automating MCQ creation, but challenges persist in ensuring mathematical accuracy and addressing student errors. This paper introduces a prototype tool designed to facilitate collaboration between LLMs and educators for streamlining the math MCQ generation process. We conduct a pilot study involving math educators to investigate how the tool can help them simplify the process of crafting high-quality math MCQs. We found that while LLMs can generate well-formulated question stems, their ability to generate distractors that capture common student errors and misconceptions is limited. Nevertheless, a human-AI collaboration has the potential to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of MCQ generation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Practical Guide for Supporting Formative Assessment and Feedback Using Generative AI

    cs.CY 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A narrative review that aligns generative AI tools with formative assessment principles, provides classroom prompt examples, and identifies missing evaluation metrics for AI feedback.

Pith tools