REVIEW 11 cited by
MARE: Multi-Agents Collaboration Framework for Requirements Engineering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Requirements Engineering (RE) is a critical phase in the software development process that generates requirements specifications from stakeholders' needs. Recently, deep learning techniques have been successful in several RE tasks. However, obtaining high-quality requirements specifications requires collaboration across multiple tasks and roles. In this paper, we propose an innovative framework called MARE, which leverages collaboration among large language models (LLMs) throughout the entire RE process. MARE divides the RE process into four tasks: elicitation, modeling, verification, and specification. Each task is conducted by engaging one or two specific agents and each agent can conduct several actions. MARE has five agents and nine actions. To facilitate collaboration between agents, MARE has designed a workspace for agents to upload their generated intermediate requirements artifacts and obtain the information they need. We conduct experiments on five public cases, one dataset, and four new cases created by this work. We compared MARE with three baselines using three widely used metrics for the generated requirements models. Experimental results show that MARE can generate more correct requirements models and outperform the state-of-the-art approaches by 15.4%. For the generated requirements specifications, we conduct a human evaluation in three aspects and provide insights about the quality
Forward citations
Cited by 11 Pith papers
-
Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
A survey that unifies prior work on multi-agent LLM systems via the LIFE framework, mapping dependencies across collaboration, failure attribution, and autonomous self-evolution while identifying cross-stage challenges.
-
ArgRE: Formal Argumentation for Conflict Resolution in Multi-Agent Requirements Negotiation
ArgRE embeds abstract argumentation into multi-agent requirements negotiation to deliver argument-level traceability, higher evaluator-rated justifications, and improved compliance coverage over heuristic baselines.
-
Model-Driven Discipline for Multi-Agent LLMs: Requirement-to-Verification Generation of Traceable System Models
A requirement-model-driven multi-agent LLM pipeline generates traceable MDE artefacts and formally checks behaviour models, with multi-agent reliably improving syntactic validity but not semantic accuracy across LLMs.
-
REAgent: Requirement-Driven LLM Agents for Software Issue Resolution
REAgent improves LLM patch generation for software issues by 17.4% on average through automated construction, quality checking, and iterative refinement of structured issue-oriented requirements.
-
QUARE: Quality-Aware Requirements Analysis through Multi-Agent Dialectical Negotiation
Quality-specialized LLM agents that dialectically negotiate cross-quality conflicts produce more balanced, standards-compliant KAOS requirements than task- or knowledge-decomposed multi-agent RE baselines.
-
UserTrace: User-Level Requirements Generation and Traceability Recovery from Software Project Repositories
UserTrace generates user-level requirements from code repositories and recovers live trace links from requirements to implementation, with evaluations suggesting gains over summarization and traceability baselines.
-
Cluster-Aware Dual-Level Test Specification Generation for Large-Scale Automotive Software Requirements
A clustering-based pipeline generates individual and integration-level test specifications from thousands of automotive requirements by grouping embeddings, summarizing clusters, and applying LLM calls with bounded co...
-
Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
The survey proposes the LIFE framework to unify fragmented research on collaboration, failure attribution, and self-evolution in LLM multi-agent systems into a progression toward self-organizing intelligence.
-
OpsAgent: An Evolving Multi-agent System for Incident Management in Microservices
OpsAgent presents a training-free multi-agent framework with dual self-evolution for automated incident management in microservices, claiming SOTA results on OPENRCA benchmark and successful production deployment at Lenovo.
-
Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey
A literature survey that collects and categorizes 124 papers on LLM-based agents for software engineering from SE and agent perspectives.
-
LLM-Based Agentic Systems for Software Engineering: Challenges and Opportunities
A survey of LLM-based multi-agent systems across the software development life cycle, plus a research agenda for orchestration, human coordination, cost, and data.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.