Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

SEvenLLM: Benchmarking, Eliciting, and Enhancing Abilities of Large Language Models in Cyber Threat Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.03446 v2 pith:I4TIQUSR submitted 2024-05-06 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords cybersecuritycybertasksthreatanalysisllmssevenllmabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

To address the increasing complexity and frequency of cybersecurity incidents emphasized by the recent cybersecurity threat reports with over 10 billion instances, cyber threat intelligence (CTI) plays a critical role in the modern cybersecurity landscape by offering the insights required to understand and combat the constantly evolving nature of cyber threats. Inspired by the powerful capability of large language models (LLMs) in handling complex tasks, in this paper, we introduce a framework to benchmark, elicit, and improve cybersecurity incident analysis and response abilities in LLMs for Security Events (SEvenLLM). Specifically, we create a high-quality bilingual instruction corpus by crawling cybersecurity raw text from cybersecurity websites to overcome the lack of effective data for information extraction. Then, we design a pipeline to auto-select tasks from the tasks pool and convert the raw text into supervised corpora comprised of question and response. The instruction dataset SEvenLLM-Instruct is used to train cybersecurity LLMs with the multi-task learning objective (27 well-designed tasks) for augmenting the analysis of cybersecurity events. Extensive experiments in our curated benchmark (SEvenLLM-bench) demonstrate that SEvenLLM performs more sophisticated threat analysis and fortifies defenses against the evolving landscape of cyber threats.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Traffic-Aware Randomized Smoothing for LLM-Based Network Intrusion Detection

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Certifying LLM intrusion detectors requires noise-augmented fine-tuning; restricting smoothing to attacker-controllable traffic features then gives 55–100% certified accuracy on two of three datasets.

  2. CTIConnect: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented LLMs over Heterogeneous Cyber Threat Intelligence

    cs.CR 2025-10 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 691-question benchmark (CTIARENA) shows LLMs need retrieval over heterogeneous cyber-threat-intelligence sources and that domain-specific retrieval beats generic RAG; the attached abstract describes a different 1,86...

  3. Uncovering Vulnerabilities of LLM-Assisted Cyber Threat Intelligence

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs assisting cyber threat intelligence fail mainly due to spurious correlations, contradictory knowledge, and constrained generalization that stem from the threat landscape itself.

  4. Benchmarking LLM-Assisted Blue Teaming via Standardized Threat Hunting

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Standardized modular threat-hunting workflows (CyberTeam) improve LLM performance on blue team tasks compared to open-ended ICL, CoT, and ToT prompting across 30 tasks and 452k samples.

  5. Open Security Benchmark: Towards Autonomous Enterprise Cyber Defense

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    OSB proposes frozen synthetic-enterprise snapshots with gold posture answers so AI agents can be benchmarked on security investigation via SQL or native vendor APIs.

  6. Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: Applications, Vulnerabilities, and Defense Techniques

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that maps LLM applications, vulnerabilities, and defenses across eight cybersecurity domains, but with significant citation and rigor problems.

Pith tools