Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quantum software experiments: A reporting and laboratory package structure guidelines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.04192 v1 pith:7GIHG646 submitted 2024-05-07 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords guidelinesquantumsoftwarelaboratorypackagesexperimentsengineeringreporting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Background. In the realm of software engineering, there are widely accepted guidelines for reporting and creating laboratory packages. Unfortunately, the landscape differs considerably in the emerging field of quantum computing. To the best of our knowledge, no standardized guidelines exist for describing experiments or outlining the necessary structures for quantum software laboratory packages. Aims. This paper endeavors to enhance the replicability and verifiability of quantum software experiments. Method. This objective is pursued through the proposition of guidelines for reporting and the delineation of a structure for laboratory packages tailored to quantum computing experiments. Specifically, we advocate for an extension and adaption of established guidelines in experimental software engineering, integrating novel elements to address the specific requirements of quantum software engineering. Results. In validating the utility and effectiveness of the proposed guidelines, we conducted a review encompassing 11 works (5 focusing on reporting guidelines and 6 on laboratory packages). In particular, this review highlighted the absence of standardized guidelines and structure of laboratory packages for quantum software experiments. Conclusions. Our assessment revealed gaps in information and opportunities for enhancement within the evaluated papers and laboratory packages. Our proposal contributes to the advancement of quantum software engineering research, taking a fundamental step toward fostering rigorous and reliable scientific research in this emerging paradigm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Claim against Measurement: Statistical Artefacts in Quantum Error Mitigation Benchmarks

    quant-ph 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Systematic review of 81 QEM papers finds only 25% use inferential methods and demonstrates via ZNE case studies that parameter sensitivity and temporal drift can create illusory performance gains.

Pith tools