RECORD
Time complexity for deterministic string machines
Formal Languages and Automata Theory · Submitted 9 May 2024
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We prove sufficient conditions for polynomial runtime guarantees on these, which can help develop complexity constraints on string machines which also encapsulate runtime complexity.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Algorithms which learn environments represented by automata in the past have had complexity scaling with the number of states in the automaton, which can be exponentially large even for automata recognizing regular expressions with a small description length. We thus formalize a compositional language that can construct automata as transformations between certain types of category, representable as string diagrams, which better reflects the description complexity of various automata. We define complexity constraints on this framework by having them operate on categories enriched over filtered sets, and using these constraints, we prove elementary results on the runtime and expressivity of a subset of these transformations which operate deterministically on finite state spaces. These string diagrams, or "string machines," are themselves morphisms in a category, so it is possible for string machines to create other string machines in runtime to model computations which take more than constant memory. We prove sufficient conditions for polynomial runtime guarantees on these, which can help develop complexity constraints on string machines which also encapsulate runtime complexity.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Algorithms which learn environments represented by automata in the past have had complexity scaling with the number of states in the automaton, which can be exponentially large even for automata recognizing regular expressions with a small description length. | background 0.97 | 0.04 | 0.04 | asserted 0.99 |
| s1 | We thus formalize a compositional language that can construct automata as transformations between certain types of category, representable as string diagrams, which better reflects the description complexity of various automata. | contribution 0.84 | 0.93 | 0.11 | asserted 0.99 |
| s2 | We define complexity constraints on this framework by having them operate on categories enriched over filtered sets, and using these constraints, we prove elementary results on the runtime and expressivity of a subset of these transformations which operate deterministically on finite state spaces. | method 0.54 | 0.95 | 0.15 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | These string diagrams, or "string machines," are themselves morphisms in a category, so it is possible for string machines to create other string machines in runtime to model computations which take more than constant memory. | contribution 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.08 | hedged possibility 0.51 |
| s4 | We prove sufficient conditions for polynomial runtime guarantees on these, which can help develop complexity constraints on string machines which also encapsulate runtime complexity. | result 0.86 | 0.95 | 0.46 | asserted 0.91 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Algorithms which learn environments represented by automata in the past have had complexity scaling with the number of states in the automaton, which can be exponentially large even for automata recognizing regular expressions with a small description length. We thus formalize a compositional language that can construct automata as transformations between certain types of category, representable as string diagrams, which better reflects the description complexity of various automata. We define complexity constraints on this framework by having them operate on categories enriched over filtered sets, and using these constraints, we prove elementary results on the runtime and expressivity of a subset of these transformations which operate deterministically on finite state spaces. These string diagrams, or "string machines," are themselves morphisms in a category, so it is possible for string machines to create other string machines in runtime to model computations which take more than constant memory. We prove sufficient conditions for polynomial runtime guarantees on these, which can help develop complexity constraints on string machines which also encapsulate runtime complexity.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.