Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Oedipus: LLM-enchanced Reasoning CAPTCHA Solver

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.07496 v1 pith:5CVU7PMK submitted 2024-05-13 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords captchasreasoningcaptchallmseffectivelyoedipusadvancedautomated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

CAPTCHAs have become a ubiquitous tool in safeguarding applications from automated bots. Over time, the arms race between CAPTCHA development and evasion techniques has led to increasingly sophisticated and diverse designs. The latest iteration, reasoning CAPTCHAs, exploits tasks that are intuitively simple for humans but challenging for conventional AI technologies, thereby enhancing security measures. Driven by the evolving AI capabilities, particularly the advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), we investigate the potential of multimodal LLMs to solve modern reasoning CAPTCHAs. Our empirical analysis reveals that, despite their advanced reasoning capabilities, LLMs struggle to solve these CAPTCHAs effectively. In response, we introduce Oedipus, an innovative end-to-end framework for automated reasoning CAPTCHA solving. Central to this framework is a novel strategy that dissects the complex and human-easy-AI-hard tasks into a sequence of simpler and AI-easy steps. This is achieved through the development of a Domain Specific Language (DSL) for CAPTCHAs that guides LLMs in generating actionable sub-steps for each CAPTCHA challenge. The DSL is customized to ensure that each unit operation is a highly solvable subtask revealed in our previous empirical study. These sub-steps are then tackled sequentially using the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) methodology. Our evaluation shows that Oedipus effectively resolves the studied CAPTCHAs, achieving an average success rate of 63.5\%. Remarkably, it also shows adaptability to the most recent CAPTCHA designs introduced in late 2023, which are not included in our initial study. This prompts a discussion on future strategies for designing reasoning CAPTCHAs that can effectively counter advanced AI solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Broken Gates: Re-evaluating Web Bot Defenses in the Age of LLM Agents

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Commercial solvers defeat puzzle captchas at near-perfect rates for pennies per thousand, while reCAPTCHA v3's resistance comes from browser-environment authenticity, not human-like behavior.

  2. Throttling Web Agents Using Reasoning Gates

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rebus-based reasoning gates, puzzles built from random word/domain clue sets, impose token costs on LM web agents that are up to 9.2x the generator's cost.

  3. IllusionCAPTCHA: A CAPTCHA based on Visual Illusion

    cs.CR 2025-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors propose a visual-illusion CAPTCHA that confused GPT-4o and Gemini in all 30 tests while 20 of 23 humans passed on the first try, though the evaluation is narrow and non-adaptive.

Pith tools