REVIEW 3 cited by
AnoVox: A Benchmark for Multimodal Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The scale-up of autonomous vehicles depends heavily on their ability to deal with anomalies, such as rare objects on the road. In order to handle such situations, it is necessary to detect anomalies in the first place. Anomaly detection for autonomous driving has made great progress in the past years but suffers from poorly designed benchmarks with a strong focus on camera data. In this work, we propose AnoVox, the largest benchmark for ANOmaly detection in autonomous driving to date. AnoVox incorporates large-scale multimodal sensor data and spatial VOXel ground truth, allowing for the comparison of methods independent of their used sensor. We propose a formal definition of normality and provide a compliant training dataset. AnoVox is the first benchmark to contain both content and temporal anomalies.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Anomalous Decision Discovery using Inverse Reinforcement Learning
TRAP combines trajectory-ranked IRL rewards with variable-horizon prefix sampling and DistilBERT to detect anomalous driving, reaching 0.90 AUC in simulation.
-
Road-Aware Anomaly Segmentation with Query-Guided Polygons and CLIP in Autonomous Driving
Road-query polygons plus CLIP zero-shot filtering turn Mask2Former soft masks into stronger training-free road anomaly segmentations, topping Maskomaly AP on Fishyscapes LostAndFound.
-
A Data-Driven Novelty Score for Diverse In-Vehicle Data Recording
An online Mahalanobis-distance novelty filter, updated with streaming data, selects a smaller traffic-sign training set that can outperform the full dataset and random sampling.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.