Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey On Text-to-3D Contents Generation In The Wild

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.09431 v1 pith:YHWZII4X submitted 2024-05-15 cs.CV cs.GR

classification cs.CVcs.GR
keywords creationgenerationtext-to-3dcontentsurveylimitationsmethodsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

3D content creation plays a vital role in various applications, such as gaming, robotics simulation, and virtual reality. However, the process is labor-intensive and time-consuming, requiring skilled designers to invest considerable effort in creating a single 3D asset. To address this challenge, text-to-3D generation technologies have emerged as a promising solution for automating 3D creation. Leveraging the success of large vision language models, these techniques aim to generate 3D content based on textual descriptions. Despite recent advancements in this area, existing solutions still face significant limitations in terms of generation quality and efficiency. In this survey, we conduct an in-depth investigation of the latest text-to-3D creation methods. We provide a comprehensive background on text-to-3D creation, including discussions on datasets employed in training and evaluation metrics used to assess the quality of generated 3D models. Then, we delve into the various 3D representations that serve as the foundation for the 3D generation process. Furthermore, we present a thorough comparison of the rapidly growing literature on generative pipelines, categorizing them into feedforward generators, optimization-based generation, and view reconstruction approaches. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of these methods, we aim to shed light on their respective capabilities and limitations. Lastly, we point out several promising avenues for future research. With this survey, we hope to inspire researchers further to explore the potential of open-vocabulary text-conditioned 3D content creation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Clarify Before Executing: A Self-Evolving Agent for Resolving Intent Asymmetry in 3D Tool Orchestration

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A clarification-first 3D agent, trained by simulated multi-turn dialogue, reaches 60.4% and 43.3% success on single- and multi-step 3D tool tasks, more than doubling prior baselines.

  2. Unifi3D: A Study on 3D Representations for Generation and Reconstruction in a Common Framework

    cs.GR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SDF grids reconstruct best, Dual Octrees score best on automatic generation metrics, but users prefer SDF output, and reconstruction plus compression errors make up a large share of generation error.

Pith tools