Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Positional encoding is not the same as context: A study on positional encoding for sequential recommendation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.10436 v2 pith:LI4PEO6E submitted 2024-05-16 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords positionalencodingstemporalencodingfootprintrecommendationsystemsmetrics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid growth of streaming media and e-commerce has driven advancements in recommendation systems, particularly Sequential Recommendation Systems (SRS). These systems employ users' interaction histories to predict future preferences. While recent research has focused on architectural innovations like transformer blocks and feature extraction, positional encodings, crucial for capturing temporal patterns, have received less attention. These encodings are often conflated with contextual, such as the temporal footprint, which previous works tend to treat as interchangeable with positional information. This paper highlights the critical distinction between temporal footprint and positional encodings, demonstrating that the latter offers unique relational cues between items, which the temporal footprint alone cannot provide. Through extensive experimentation on eight Amazon datasets and subsets, we assess the impact of various encodings on performance metrics and training stability. We introduce new positional encodings and investigate integration strategies that improve both metrics and stability, surpassing state-of-the-art results at the time of this work's initial preprint. Importantly, we demonstrate that selecting the appropriate encoding is not only key to better performance but also essential for building robust, reliable SRS models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Contextual-Aware Position Encoding for Sequential Recommendation

    cs.IR 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CAPE computes context-dependent positions from item dissimilarity and fuses them into attention, improving sequential recommenders on benchmark and live-traffic tests.

Pith tools