Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.12063 v2 pith:OIJWZ6OM submitted 2024-05-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsclamberuserclarifyingidentifyingambiguityambiguousbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to meet user information needs, but their effectiveness in dealing with user queries that contain various types of ambiguity remains unknown, ultimately risking user trust and satisfaction. To this end, we introduce CLAMBER, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs using a well-organized taxonomy. Building upon the taxonomy, we construct ~12K high-quality data to assess the strengths, weaknesses, and potential risks of various off-the-shelf LLMs. Our findings indicate the limited practical utility of current LLMs in identifying and clarifying ambiguous user queries, even enhanced by chain-of-thought (CoT) and few-shot prompting. These techniques may result in overconfidence in LLMs and yield only marginal enhancements in identifying ambiguity. Furthermore, current LLMs fall short in generating high-quality clarifying questions due to a lack of conflict resolution and inaccurate utilization of inherent knowledge. In this paper, CLAMBER presents a guidance and promotes further research on proactive and trustworthy LLMs. Our dataset is available at https://github.com/zt991211/CLAMBER

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CITBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Interactive Tabular Data Processing with LLMs

    cs.DB 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    CITBench is a new benchmark for LLM table processing with 1,296 tasks, showing that model accuracy falls sharply under multi-turn interaction noise and complex dependencies.

  2. Clarify Before Executing: A Self-Evolving Agent for Resolving Intent Asymmetry in 3D Tool Orchestration

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A clarification-first 3D agent, trained by simulated multi-turn dialogue, reaches 60.4% and 43.3% success on single- and multi-step 3D tool tasks, more than doubling prior baselines.

  3. Referential ambiguity and clarification requests: comparing human and LLM behaviour

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Humans seldom ask clarification questions for referential ambiguity, while LLMs ask them more often, and reasoning prompts increase LLM question frequency and relevance.

Pith tools