REVIEW 3 cited by
CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to meet user information needs, but their effectiveness in dealing with user queries that contain various types of ambiguity remains unknown, ultimately risking user trust and satisfaction. To this end, we introduce CLAMBER, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs using a well-organized taxonomy. Building upon the taxonomy, we construct ~12K high-quality data to assess the strengths, weaknesses, and potential risks of various off-the-shelf LLMs. Our findings indicate the limited practical utility of current LLMs in identifying and clarifying ambiguous user queries, even enhanced by chain-of-thought (CoT) and few-shot prompting. These techniques may result in overconfidence in LLMs and yield only marginal enhancements in identifying ambiguity. Furthermore, current LLMs fall short in generating high-quality clarifying questions due to a lack of conflict resolution and inaccurate utilization of inherent knowledge. In this paper, CLAMBER presents a guidance and promotes further research on proactive and trustworthy LLMs. Our dataset is available at https://github.com/zt991211/CLAMBER
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
CITBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Interactive Tabular Data Processing with LLMs
CITBench is a new benchmark for LLM table processing with 1,296 tasks, showing that model accuracy falls sharply under multi-turn interaction noise and complex dependencies.
-
Clarify Before Executing: A Self-Evolving Agent for Resolving Intent Asymmetry in 3D Tool Orchestration
A clarification-first 3D agent, trained by simulated multi-turn dialogue, reaches 60.4% and 43.3% success on single- and multi-step 3D tool tasks, more than doubling prior baselines.
-
Referential ambiguity and clarification requests: comparing human and LLM behaviour
Humans seldom ask clarification questions for referential ambiguity, while LLMs ask them more often, and reasoning prompts increase LLM question frequency and relevance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.