Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Mamba in Speech: Towards an Alternative to Self-Attention

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.12609 v6 pith:24I6DOP7 submitted 2024-05-21 eess.AS cs.SD

Mamba in Speech: Towards an Alternative to Self-Attention

classification eess.AS cs.SD
keywords speechmambaprocessingtasksalternativeself-attentiontransformerbidirectional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transformer and its derivatives have achieved success in diverse tasks across computer vision, natural language processing, and speech processing. To reduce the complexity of computations within the multi-head self-attention mechanism in Transformer, Selective State Space Models (i.e., Mamba) were proposed as an alternative. Mamba exhibited its effectiveness in natural language processing and computer vision tasks, but its superiority has rarely been investigated in speech signal processing. This paper explores solutions for applying Mamba to speech processing by discussing two typical speech processing tasks: speech recognition, which requires semantic and sequential information, and speech enhancement, which focuses primarily on sequential patterns. The experimental results confirm that bidirectional Mamba (BiMamba) consistently outperforms vanilla Mamba, highlighting the advantages of a bidirectional design for speech processing. Moreover, experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of BiMamba as an alternative to the self-attention module in the Transformer model and its derivates, particularly for the semantic-aware task. The crucial technologies for transferring Mamba to speech are then summarized in ablation studies and the discussion section, offering insights for extending this research to a broader scope of tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. An Exploration of Mamba for Speech Self-Supervised Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Mamba-based HuBERT models match or exceed Transformer versions on speech tasks while using far less compute for long sequences and streaming ASR.

  2. State Space Models for Bioacoustics: A Comparative Evaluation with Transformers

    cs.SD 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    BioMamba matches Transformer performance on bioacoustics tasks while using significantly less VRAM.

  3. A Survey of Mamba

    cs.LG 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper consolidates existing research on Mamba models, their architecture variants, adaptations to different data modalities, and applications across domains.