REVIEW 1 cited by
Lipschitz minimization and the Goldstein modulus
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Goldstein's 1977 idealized iteration for minimizing a Lipschitz objective fixes a distance - the step size - and relies on a certain approximate subgradient. That "Goldstein subgradient" is the shortest convex combination of objective gradients at points within that distance of the current iterate. A recent implementable Goldstein-style algorithm allows a remarkable complexity analysis (Zhang et al. 2020), and a more sophisticated variant (Davis and Jiang, 2022) leverages typical objective geometry to force near-linear convergence. To explore such methods, we introduce a new modulus, based on Goldstein subgradients, that robustly measures the slope of a Lipschitz function. We relate near-linear convergence of Goldstein-style methods to linear growth of this modulus at minimizers. We illustrate the idea computationally with a simple heuristic for Lipschitz minimization.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Subgradient Regularization: A Descent-Oriented Subgradient Method for Nonsmooth Optimization
Subgradient regularization builds stable descent directions for nonsmooth marginal functions, provably converges to stationary points, and recovers the prox-linear method as a special case.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.