Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Better Simulations for Validating Causal Discovery with the DAG-Adaptation of the Onion Method

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.13100 v1 pith:Q6H24RNO submitted 2024-05-21 stat.ME cs.AI

classification stat.MEcs.AI
keywords simulationmethodcausallinearsimulationsalgorithmsdagsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The number of artificial intelligence algorithms for learning causal models from data is growing rapidly. Most ``causal discovery'' or ``causal structure learning'' algorithms are primarily validated through simulation studies. However, no widely accepted simulation standards exist and publications often report conflicting performance statistics -- even when only considering publications that simulate data from linear models. In response, several manuscripts have criticized a popular simulation design for validating algorithms in the linear case. We propose a new simulation design for generating linear models for directed acyclic graphs (DAGs): the DAG-adaptation of the Onion (DaO) method. DaO simulations are fundamentally different from existing simulations because they prioritize the distribution of correlation matrices rather than the distribution of linear effects. Specifically, the DaO method uniformly samples the space of all correlation matrices consistent with (i.e. Markov to) a DAG. We also discuss how to sample DAGs and present methods for generating DAGs with scale-free in-degree or out-degree. We compare the DaO method against two alternative simulation designs and provide implementations of the DaO method in Python and R: https://github.com/bja43/DaO_simulation. We advocate for others to adopt DaO simulations as a fair universal benchmark.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Simulating Complex Crossectional and Longitudinal Data using the simDAG R Package

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    simDAG generates complex cross-sectional and longitudinal simulation data from DAG-defined structural equations, including time-to-event outcomes with recurrent or competing events and time-varying covariates.

Pith tools