Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Epistemic EFX Allocations Exist for Monotone Valuations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.14463 v2 pith:HBDIUEJY submitted 2024-05-23 cs.GT

classification cs.GT
keywords eefxvaluationsallocationsagentsexistencegeneralmonotoneadditive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the fundamental problem of fairly dividing a set of indivisible items among agents with (general) monotone valuations. The notion of envy-freeness up to any item (EFX) is considered to be one of the most fascinating fairness concepts in this line of work. Unfortunately, despite significant efforts, existence of EFX allocations is a major open problem in fair division, thereby making the study of approximations and relaxations of EFX a natural line of research. Recently, Caragiannis et al. introduced a promising relaxation of EFX, called epistemic EFX (EEFX). We say an allocation to be EEFX if, for every agent, it is possible to shuffle the items in the remaining bundles so that she becomes "EFX-satisfied". Caragiannis et al. prove existence and polynomial-time computability of EEFX allocations for additive valuations. A natural question asks what happens when we consider valuations more general than additive? We address this important open question and answer it affirmatively by establishing the existence of EEFX allocations for an arbitrary number of agents with general monotone valuations. To the best of our knowledge, EEFX is the only known relaxation of EFX (beside EF1) to have such strong existential guarantees. Furthermore, we complement our existential result by proving computational and information-theoretic lower bounds. We prove that even for an arbitrary number of (more than one) agents with identical submodular valuations, it is PLS-hard to compute EEFX allocations and it requires exponentially-many value queries to do so.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Simultaneously Satisfying MXS and EFL

    cs.GT 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For monotone restricted MMS-feasible valuations, an allocation that is simultaneously MXS and EFL always exists, and the paper gives a constructive algorithm for it.

  2. Improved Approximate EFX Guarantees for Multigraphs

    cs.GT 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For additive valuations over goods relevant to at most two agents, the paper proves existence of a 1/√2-approximate EFX allocation, improving the prior 2/3 bound.

Pith tools