Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Mamba-R: Vision Mamba ALSO Needs Registers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.14858 v2 pith:6GU3TAQZ submitted 2024-05-23 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords mambamamba-rvisionregistersaccuracyappearartifactsattains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Similar to Vision Transformers, this paper identifies artifacts also present within the feature maps of Vision Mamba. These artifacts, corresponding to high-norm tokens emerging in low-information background areas of images, appear much more severe in Vision Mamba -- they exist prevalently even with the tiny-sized model and activate extensively across background regions. To mitigate this issue, we follow the prior solution of introducing register tokens into Vision Mamba. To better cope with Mamba blocks' uni-directional inference paradigm, two key modifications are introduced: 1) evenly inserting registers throughout the input token sequence, and 2) recycling registers for final decision predictions. We term this new architecture Mamba-R. Qualitative observations suggest, compared to vanilla Vision Mamba, Mamba-R's feature maps appear cleaner and more focused on semantically meaningful regions. Quantitatively, Mamba-R attains stronger performance and scales better. For example, on the ImageNet benchmark, our base-size Mamba-R attains 83.0% accuracy, significantly outperforming Vim-B's 81.8%; furthermore, we provide the first successful scaling to the large model size (i.e., with 341M parameters), attaining a competitive accuracy of 83.6% (84.5% if finetuned with 384x384 inputs). Additional validation on the downstream semantic segmentation task also supports Mamba-R's efficacy. Code is available at https://github.com/wangf3014/Mamba-Reg.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FractalMamba++: Scaling Vision Mamba Across Resolutions via Hilbert Fractal Geometry

    cs.CV 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    FractalMamba++ scales Vision Mamba across resolutions by using Hilbert fractal serialization, hierarchy-based skip connections, and fractal-aware 2D rotary position encoding.

  2. HAMSA: Scanning-Free Vision State Space Models via SpectralPulseNet

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    HAMSA achieves 85.7% ImageNet-1K top-1 accuracy as a spectral-domain SSM with 2.2x faster inference and lower memory than transformers or scanning-based SSMs.

  3. Self-Navigated Residual Mamba for Universal Industrial Anomaly Detection

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SNARM combines memory-bank residuals, self-referential in-image residuals, and residual-guided Mamba scanning to report state-of-the-art anomaly detection scores on three benchmarks.

  4. Can Visual Mamba Improve AI-Generated Image Detection? An In-Depth Investigation

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Benchmarks Vision Mamba variants for AI-generated image detection against CNN, ViT, and VLM detectors on diverse datasets and synthetic sources, reporting promise alongside limitations.

  5. A Survey of Mamba

    cs.LG 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper consolidates existing research on Mamba models, their architecture variants, adaptations to different data modalities, and applications across domains.

Pith tools