REVIEW 2 cited by
MicroAdam: Accurate Adaptive Optimization with Low Space Overhead and Provable Convergence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We propose a new variant of the Adam optimizer called MicroAdam that specifically minimizes memory overheads, while maintaining theoretical convergence guarantees. We achieve this by compressing the gradient information before it is fed into the optimizer state, thereby reducing its memory footprint significantly. We control the resulting compression error via a novel instance of the classical \emph{error feedback} mechanism from distributed optimization in which *the error correction information is itself compressed* to allow for practical memory gains. We prove that the resulting approach maintains theoretical convergence guarantees competitive to those of AMSGrad, while providing good practical performance. Specifically, we show that MicroAdam can be implemented efficiently on GPUs: on both million-scale (BERT) and billion-scale (LLaMA) models, MicroAdam provides practical convergence competitive to that of the uncompressed Adam baseline, with lower memory usage and similar running time. Our code is available at https://github.com/IST-DASLab/MicroAdam.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Low-rank Momentum Factorization for Memory Efficient Training
MoFaSGD keeps a low-rank factored momentum and uses its singular vectors as the update direction, achieving LoRA-level memory with competitive fine-tuning performance, but its convergence proof is flawed.
-
Geometrically Principled Randomized Optimization for Efficient LLM Training
Randomized Grassmannian subspace updates, combined with Adam-state alignment and residual recovery, produce small evaluation-loss gains over prior low-rank LLM training methods.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.