Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A hierarchical Bayesian model for syntactic priming

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.15964 v1 pith:JHJV3PGP submitted 2024-05-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords syntacticprimingmodelbayesianhierarchicalpropertiesrepresentsaccount
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The effect of syntactic priming exhibits three well-documented empirical properties: the lexical boost, the inverse frequency effect, and the asymmetrical decay. We aim to show how these three empirical phenomena can be reconciled in a general learning framework, the hierarchical Bayesian model (HBM). The model represents syntactic knowledge in a hierarchical structure of syntactic statistics, where a lower level represents the verb-specific biases of syntactic decisions, and a higher level represents the abstract bias as an aggregation of verb-specific biases. This knowledge is updated in response to experience by Bayesian inference. In simulations, we show that the HBM captures the above-mentioned properties of syntactic priming. The results indicate that some properties of priming which are usually explained by a residual activation account can also be explained by an implicit learning account. We also discuss the model's implications for the lexical basis of syntactic priming.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Process of Categorical Clipping at the Core of the Genesis of Concepts in Synthetic Neural Cognition

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Words that strongly activate both a lower-layer neuron and its strongly connected upper-layer neuron in GPT-2XL form more semantically similar clusters, which the paper interprets as a clipping process.

  2. How Do Artificial Intelligences Think? The Three Mathematico-Cognitive Factors of Categorical Segmentation Operated by Synthetic Neurons

    q-bio.NC 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper names three components of a neuron's aggregation function as cognitive factors and reports near-unity correlations in GPT-2XL, but the effects are largely true by construction.

Pith tools