REVIEW 1 cited by
On Bits and Bandits: Quantifying the Regret-Information Trade-off
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In many sequential decision problems, an agent performs a repeated task. He then suffers regret and obtains information that he may use in the following rounds. However, sometimes the agent may also obtain information and avoid suffering regret by querying external sources. We study the trade-off between the information an agent accumulates and the regret it suffers. We invoke information-theoretic methods for obtaining regret lower bounds, that also allow us to easily re-derive several known lower bounds. We introduce the first Bayesian regret lower bounds that depend on the information an agent accumulates. We also prove regret upper bounds using the amount of information the agent accumulates. These bounds show that information measured in bits, can be traded off for regret, measured in reward. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of these bounds in improving the performance of a question-answering task with large language models, allowing us to obtain valuable insights.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Information Routing across Batch Boundaries: Memory--Batch Tradeoffs in Lipschitz Bandits
For W at least C_d log(eT), minimax pseudo-regret in Lipschitz bandits is, up to logarithmic factors, the maximum of the sequential rate, a new memory-batch penalty T^((d+2)/(d+3)) (1+(B-1)W)^(-1/(d(d+3))), and a batc...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.