Pith. sign in

REVIEW

How many samples are needed to train a deep neural network?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.16696 v2 pith:HNBTOLCF submitted 2024-05-26 math.ST stat.MLstat.TH

classification math.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords neuralmanynetworksfeed-forwardneedednetworkraterelu
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Neural networks have become standard tools in many areas, yet many important statistical questions remain open. This paper studies the question of how much data are needed to train a ReLU feed-forward neural network. Our theoretical and empirical results suggest that the generalization error of ReLU feed-forward neural networks scales at the rate $1/\sqrt{n}$ in the sample size $n$ rather than the usual "parametric rate" $1/n$. Thus, broadly speaking, our results underpin the common belief that neural networks need "many" training samples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools