REVIEW 3 cited by
Perturbation-Restrained Sequential Model Editing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Model editing is an emerging field that focuses on updating the knowledge embedded within large language models (LLMs) without extensive retraining. However, current model editing methods significantly compromise the general abilities of LLMs as the number of edits increases, and this trade-off poses a substantial challenge to the continual learning of LLMs. In this paper, we first theoretically analyze that the factor affecting the general abilities in sequential model editing lies in the condition number of the edited matrix. The condition number of a matrix represents its numerical sensitivity, and therefore can be used to indicate the extent to which the original knowledge associations stored in LLMs are perturbed after editing. Subsequently, statistical findings demonstrate that the value of this factor becomes larger as the number of edits increases, thereby exacerbating the deterioration of general abilities. To this end, a framework termed Perturbation Restraint on Upper bouNd for Editing (PRUNE) is proposed, which applies the condition number restraints in sequential editing. These restraints can lower the upper bound on perturbation to edited models, thus preserving the general abilities. Systematically, we conduct experiments employing three editing methods on three LLMs across four downstream tasks. The results show that PRUNE can preserve general abilities while maintaining the editing performance effectively in sequential model editing. The code are available at https://github.com/mjy1111/PRUNE.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Moir: Let the Model Direct Its Own Story for Robust Cross-Domain Knowledge Editing
MOIR: estimating the preservation covariance from a model's own random-token generations reduces collapse of math/code capabilities in some knowledge-editing settings, but the claimed consistency is not supported by t...
-
Efficient Knowledge Editing via Minimal Precomputation
Precomputing only a few thousand hidden vectors instead of 44 million is enough for MEMIT, ROME, and EMMET editing to match full-precomputation scores on CounterFact.
-
Reproducibility Study of "AlphaEdit: Null-Space Constrained Knowledge Editing for Language Models"
Reproducibility study confirms AlphaEdit on original setups but finds performance degrades at high edit counts, fails to generalize to newer models, and harms downstream tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.