Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Interpretable Prognostics with Concept Bottleneck Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.17575 v1 pith:N3GRXNZQ submitted 2024-05-27 cs.LG eess.SPstat.ML

classification cs.LGeess.SPstat.ML
keywords conceptcbmsconceptsinterpretablemodelsprognosticsapplicationsattribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning approaches have recently been extensively explored for the prognostics of industrial assets. However, they still suffer from a lack of interpretability, which hinders their adoption in safety-critical applications. To improve their trustworthiness, explainable AI (XAI) techniques have been applied in prognostics, primarily to quantify the importance of input variables for predicting the remaining useful life (RUL) using post-hoc attribution methods. In this work, we propose the application of Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs), a family of inherently interpretable neural network architectures based on concept explanations, to the task of RUL prediction. Unlike attribution methods, which explain decisions in terms of low-level input features, concepts represent high-level information that is easily understandable by users. Moreover, once verified in actual applications, CBMs enable domain experts to intervene on the concept activations at test-time. We propose using the different degradation modes of an asset as intermediate concepts. Our case studies on the New Commercial Modular AeroPropulsion System Simulation (N-CMAPSS) aircraft engine dataset for RUL prediction demonstrate that the performance of CBMs can be on par or superior to black-box models, while being more interpretable, even when the available labeled concepts are limited. Code available at \href{https://github.com/EPFL-IMOS/concept-prognostics/}{\url{github.com/EPFL-IMOS/concept-prognostics/}}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Survival Concept-Based Learning Models

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SurvCBM and SurvRCM combine concept bottleneck learning with Cox and Beran survival models, and SurvCBM achieves the best C-index and concept F1 on synthetic MNIST and CIFAR experiments.

Pith tools