Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Toxicity Detection for Free

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.18822 v2 pith:3E63MUJ4 submitted 2024-05-29 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords toxicpromptsllmsrefusebenigndetectorsexamplesfirst
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current LLMs are generally aligned to follow safety requirements and tend to refuse toxic prompts. However, LLMs can fail to refuse toxic prompts or be overcautious and refuse benign examples. In addition, state-of-the-art toxicity detectors have low TPRs at low FPR, incurring high costs in real-world applications where toxic examples are rare. In this paper, we introduce Moderation Using LLM Introspection (MULI), which detects toxic prompts using the information extracted directly from LLMs themselves. We found we can distinguish between benign and toxic prompts from the distribution of the first response token's logits. Using this idea, we build a robust detector of toxic prompts using a sparse logistic regression model on the first response token logits. Our scheme outperforms SOTA detectors under multiple metrics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Paladin: Defending LLM-enabled Phishing Emails with a New Trigger-Tag Paradigm

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A trigger-tag watermark embedded by fine-tuning lets modified LLMs mark their own phishing outputs for cheap detection.

  2. Exploring Multimodal Challenges in Toxic Chinese Detection: Taxonomy, Benchmark, and Findings

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new taxonomy and dataset of 8 types of perturbed toxic Chinese show nine top LLMs often miss these obfuscated insults, and small-sample ICL or fine-tuning causes overcorrection.

Pith tools