Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MEMoE: Enhancing Model Editing with Mixture of Experts Adaptors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.19086 v2 pith:Z7Y3E6UK submitted 2024-05-29 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords editingknowledgemodelgeneralizationmemoeanchorbalancebatch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Model editing aims to efficiently alter the behavior of Large Language Models (LLMs) within a desired scope, while ensuring no adverse impact on other inputs. Recent years have witnessed various model editing methods been proposed. However, these methods either exhibit poor overall performance or struggle to strike a balance between generalization and locality. We propose MEMoE, a model editing adapter utilizing a Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture with a knowledge anchor routing strategy. MEMoE updates knowledge using a bypass MoE structure, keeping the original parameters unchanged to preserve the general ability of LLMs. And, the knowledge anchor routing ensures that inputs requiring similar knowledge are routed to the same expert, thereby enhancing the generalization of the updated knowledge. Experimental results show the superiority of our approach over both batch editing and sequential batch editing tasks, exhibiting exceptional overall performance alongside outstanding balance between generalization and locality. Our code will be available.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking and Rethinking Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Under autoregressive and sequential editing, parameter-based knowledge editing methods perform poorly, while the retrieval-based SCR baseline consistently outperforms them across datasets and models.

  2. AUTOLAW: Enhancing Legal Compliance in Large Language Models via Case Law Generation and Jury-Inspired Deliberation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AutoLaw's verifier-ranked legal-role jury with a similar-case demonstration beats majority voting for violation detection on three law and policy benchmarks.

Pith tools