Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A study of why we need to reassess full reference image quality assessment with medical images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.19097 v4 pith:2SFHEVP7 submitted 2024-05-29 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords medicalimagesassessmentclinicalimagingpsnrssimalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Image quality assessment (IQA) is indispensable in clinical practice to ensure high standards, as well as in the development stage of machine learning algorithms that operate on medical images. The popular full reference (FR) IQA measures PSNR and SSIM are known and tested for working successfully in many natural imaging tasks, but discrepancies in medical scenarios have been reported in the literature, highlighting the gap between development and actual clinical application. Such inconsistencies are not surprising, as medical images have very different properties than natural images, and PSNR and SSIM have neither been targeted nor properly tested for medical images. This may cause unforeseen problems in clinical applications due to wrong judgment of novel methods. This paper provides a structured and comprehensive overview of examples where PSNR and SSIM prove to be unsuitable for the assessment of novel algorithms using different kinds of medical images, including real-world MRI, CT, OCT, X-Ray, digital pathology and photoacoustic imaging data. Therefore, improvement is urgently needed in particular in this era of AI to increase reliability and explainability in machine learning for medical imaging and beyond. Lastly, we will provide ideas for future research as well as suggesting guidelines for the usage of FR-IQA measures applied to medical images.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pathology-Guided Virtual Staining Metric for Evaluation and Training

    eess.IV 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    PaPIS is a pathology-aware full-reference similarity metric for virtual staining, built from cell-morphology segmentation features and Retinex decomposition, demonstrated as both an evaluation score and a training loss.

Pith tools