pith. sign in

arxiv: 2405.19130 · v5 · pith:RIER75BGnew · submitted 2024-05-29 · ✦ hep-ph

Transverse Momentum Distribution of kaons, pions, and (anti-)protons production in U+U collisions at sqrt{s_(NN)} = 193 GeV using the UrQMD Model

Ying Yuan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 00:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords U+U collisionsUrQMD modeltransverse momentum spectranuclear deformationpair productioncentrality dependencepions kaons protons
0
0 comments X

The pith

U+U collision dynamics are sensitive to uranium nucleus deformation, with pair production dominating at mid-rapidity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses the UrQMD model to simulate transverse momentum spectra of pions, kaons, and protons in uranium-uranium collisions at 193 GeV. It compares results from the cascade mode and the soft momentum-dependent equation of state mode across nine centrality classes. The prolate deformation of the uranium nuclei is found to affect the initial geometry and the resulting particle production. The cascade mode matches the low transverse momentum region better while the SM-EoS mode matches the high transverse momentum region, and particle-to-antiparticle ratios near unity indicate pair production as the main creation mechanism.

Core claim

The U+U collision dynamics are highly sensitive to the prolate deformation of the uranium nucleus. Consequently, the cascade mode is more appropriate for describing the low-pT region (pT < 1.2 GeV/c), while the SM-EoS mode better captures the trends in the high-pT region (pT > 1.2 GeV/c). At RHIC energies, pair production is the dominant mechanism for particle creation in the mid-rapidity region, as shown by particle-to-antiparticle ratios approaching unity.

What carries the argument

The UrQMD transport model run in cascade and SM-EoS modes on prolate deformed uranium nuclei to generate centrality-dependent transverse momentum spectra.

If this is right

  • Cascade mode describes low-pT spectra (pT < 1.2 GeV/c) while SM-EoS mode describes high-pT spectra.
  • Particle-to-antiparticle ratios near one show pair production dominates at mid-rapidity.
  • Average transverse momentum and yields vary systematically with collision centrality from 0% to 80%.
  • Nuclear deformation alters initial geometry and subsequent particle production across all species studied.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Transport models for other deformed nuclei may require explicit shape parameters to match data.
  • Centrality-dependent ratios could help separate deformation effects from other initial-state variations.
  • Direct comparison to RHIC U+U data would test whether one mode can be ruled out entirely.

Load-bearing premise

The UrQMD model in both modes accurately represents the collision dynamics and particle production in deformed U+U systems so that observed differences can be attributed to nuclear deformation rather than model limitations.

What would settle it

Experimental pT spectra from U+U collisions at 193 GeV that fail to match either mode's predictions in a manner inconsistent with varying the uranium deformation parameter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2405.19130 by Ying Yuan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Transverse momentum spectra of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Transverse momentum spectra of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Transverse momentum spectra of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this study, we investigate the transverse momentum spectra of $K ^{\pm }$, $\pi ^{\pm }$ and $p(\bar{p})$ in mid-rapidity ($\left | y \right | < 0.1$) for nine centrality classes ranging from $0\%$ to $80\%$ in $^{238} U$+$^{238} U$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=193 GeV. The simulations are performed using the Ultra-relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics (UrQMD) model, specifically employing both the cascade mode and the soft momentum-dependent equation of state (SM-EoS) mode. Additionally, we extract other observables from the $p_{T}$ spectrum, including the average transverse momentum ($\left \langle p_{T} \right \rangle$), the particle yield ($dN/dy$) and particle-type ratios, presenting them as a function of collision centrality. We find that the collision dynamics are significantly sensitive to the prolate deformation of the uranium nuclei, which influences the initial geometry and subsequent particle production. We find that the U+U collision dynamics are highly sensitive to the deformation of the uranium nucleus. Consequently, the cascade mode is more appropriate for describing the low-$p_{T}$ region ($p_{T} < 1.2 GeV/c$), while the SM-EoS mode better captures the trends in the high-$p_{T}$ region ($p_{T} > 1.2 GeV/c$). Furthermore, at RHIC energies, our results indicate that pair production is the dominant mechanism for particle creation in the mid-rapidity region. This conclusion is corroborated by the particle-to-antiparticle production ratio, which approaches unity-indicating a high degree of matter-antimatter symmetry in the observed collision events.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript simulates transverse momentum spectra of K±, π±, and p(p-bar) in mid-rapidity (|y|<0.1) for U+U collisions at √s_NN=193 GeV using the UrQMD model in both cascade and SM-EoS modes across nine centrality classes (0-80%). It extracts <pT>, dN/dy, and particle ratios versus centrality, reports sensitivity of the dynamics to the prolate deformation of the uranium nuclei, and concludes that the cascade mode is more appropriate for pT<1.2 GeV/c while SM-EoS better describes pT>1.2 GeV/c, with pair production dominating at mid-rapidity as indicated by particle-to-antiparticle ratios approaching unity.

Significance. If the mode-specific conclusions were validated, the explicit demonstration of deformation sensitivity in U+U systems and the differential performance of the two UrQMD modes could guide transport-model choices for RHIC-energy studies. The paper's strength lies in its consistent use of the same Monte Carlo framework to generate multiple observables (spectra, yields, ratios) and in its direct comparison of cascade versus SM-EoS implementations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the cascade mode is more appropriate for describing the low-pT region (pT < 1.2 GeV/c), while the SM-EoS mode better captures the trends in the high-pT region (pT > 1.2 GeV/c)' is not supported by any comparison to experimental data; only intra-model differences between the two UrQMD modes are shown, so the attribution of physical appropriateness cannot be tested.
  2. [Results] Results (as described in abstract and reader's summary): the claim that U+U collision dynamics are 'highly sensitive to the deformation of the uranium nucleus' and that this sensitivity determines mode preference rests entirely on internal variations; without overlaying measured STAR/PHENIX spectra at the same energy and centrality, differences between modes could arise from transport implementation details rather than real collision physics.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains two nearly identical consecutive sentences ('We find that the collision dynamics are significantly sensitive to the prolate deformation...' and 'We find that the U+U collision dynamics are highly sensitive...') that should be consolidated for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address the major points below and will revise the manuscript to ensure claims are limited to the scope of our model study.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the cascade mode is more appropriate for describing the low-pT region (pT < 1.2 GeV/c), while the SM-EoS mode better captures the trends in the high-pT region (pT > 1.2 GeV/c)' is not supported by any comparison to experimental data; only intra-model differences between the two UrQMD modes are shown, so the attribution of physical appropriateness cannot be tested.

    Authors: We agree that the study contains no experimental data comparisons, so statements implying physical appropriateness of either mode cannot be justified. The original phrasing reflected observed differences in pT dependence between the two UrQMD implementations. We will revise the abstract to remove 'more appropriate' and 'better captures' and instead describe the distinct pT-region behaviors seen in the cascade versus SM-EoS runs, making clear that these are internal model results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results (as described in abstract and reader's summary): the claim that U+U collision dynamics are 'highly sensitive to the deformation of the uranium nucleus' and that this sensitivity determines mode preference rests entirely on internal variations; without overlaying measured STAR/PHENIX spectra at the same energy and centrality, differences between modes could arise from transport implementation details rather than real collision physics.

    Authors: The deformation sensitivity is quantified by comparing runs with prolate-deformed versus spherical uranium nuclei inside the identical UrQMD framework, producing clear differences in spectra, yields, and ratios. We accept that these remain model-internal results and do not demonstrate which mode better matches nature. We will revise the text to state that the observed sensitivities are model predictions and to remove any suggestion that they determine a physically preferred mode without external validation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct Monte Carlo outputs with no analytic derivation chain

full rationale

The manuscript reports UrQMD transport simulations (cascade and SM-EoS modes) of pT spectra, yields, and ratios in U+U collisions. No equations, fitted parameters, or functional forms are derived or renamed as predictions. All reported quantities are direct simulation outputs. The mode-comparison claim rests on internal differences rather than any self-referential reduction or self-citation load-bearing step. The pair-production conclusion follows immediately from simulated particle-to-antiparticle ratios approaching unity. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The study rests on the domain assumption that UrQMD faithfully reproduces the relevant dynamics; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption UrQMD cascade and SM-EoS modes correctly capture the collision dynamics and particle production in U+U systems at 193 GeV
    All conclusions about deformation sensitivity and mode appropriateness presuppose the model's validity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5885 in / 1253 out tokens · 21703 ms · 2026-05-24T00:43:49.721363+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    College of Pharmacy, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530200, China

    work page

  2. [2]

    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China Abstract In this study, the transverse momentum spectra of k±, π± and p(¯p) particles in mid-rapidity (|y| < 0.1) for nine centrality classes are investigated in 238U+238U collisions at √sN N=193 GeV within the cascade and soft momentum-depend...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Energy dependence of Λ and Ξ production in central Pb+Pb collisions at 20A, 30A, 40A, 80A,and 158A GeV measured at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron,

    C. Alt et al. [NA49 Collaboration], “Energy dependence of Λ and Ξ production in central Pb+Pb collisions at 20A, 30A, 40A, 80A,and 158A GeV measured at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron,” Physical Review C , vol. 78, no. 3, Aticle ID 034918, 2008

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Pseudorapidity Distributions of Charged Particles and Contributions of Leading Nucleons in Cu-Cu Collisions at High Energies,

    J. X. Sun, F. H. Liu and E. Q. Wang, “Pseudorapidity Distributions of Charged Particles and Contributions of Leading Nucleons in Cu-Cu Collisions at High Energies,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 27, no. 3, Aticle ID 032503, 2010

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Singly and Doubly Charged Projectile Fragments in Nucleus-Emulsion Collisions at Dubna Energy in the Framework of the Multi-Source Model,

    E. Q. Wang, F. H. Liu, M. A. Rahim, S. Fakhraddin, J. X. Sun, “Singly and Doubly Charged Projectile Fragments in Nucleus-Emulsion Collisions at Dubna Energy in the Framework of the Multi-Source Model,” Chinese Physics Letters , vol. 28, no. 8, Aticle ID 082501, 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Strongly coupled matter near phase transition,

    B. C. Li, and M. Huang, “Strongly coupled matter near phase transition,” Journal of Physics G-Nuclear and Particle Physics , vol. 36, Aticle ID 064062, 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Anisotropic emission of charged mesons and structure characteristic of emission source in heavy ion collisions at 1–2A GeV,

    F. H. Liu, “Anisotropic emission of charged mesons and structure characteristic of emission source in heavy ion collisions at 1–2A GeV,” Chinese Physics B , vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 883-895, 2008

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Measurement of electrons from open heavy- flavor hadron decays in Au+Au collisions at √sN N= 200 GeV with the STAR detector,

    M. I. Abdulhamid, et al. [STAR Collaboration], “Measurement of electrons from open heavy- flavor hadron decays in Au+Au collisions at √sN N= 200 GeV with the STAR detector,” J. High Energ. Phys. , vol. 2023, Aticle number 176, 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Beam-energy dependence of the directed flow of deuterons in Au+Au collisions,

    J. Adam, et al. [STAR Collaboration], “Beam-energy dependence of the directed flow of deuterons in Au+Au collisions,” Phys. Rev. C , vol. 102, Aticle ID 044906, 2020

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    An investigation of the antinuclei and nuclei pro- duction mechanism in Pb + Pb collisions at 158 A GeV,

    R. Arsenescu et al. [NA52 Collaboration], “An investigation of the antinuclei and nuclei pro- duction mechanism in Pb + Pb collisions at 158 A GeV,” New Journal of Physics , vol. 5, pp. 150, 2003

    work page 2003

  11. [11]

    Helium-3 production from Pb+Pb collisions at SPS energies with the UrQMD model and the traditional coalescence afterburner,

    Q. F. Li, Y. J. Wang, X. B. Wang and C. W. Shen, “Helium-3 production from Pb+Pb collisions at SPS energies with the UrQMD model and the traditional coalescence afterburner,” Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy , vol. 59, no. 3, Aticle ID 632002, 2016

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    An evidence of mass-dependent differen- tial kinetic freeze-out scenario observed in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV,

    H. L. Lao, H. R. Wei, F. H. Liu and Roy A. Lacey, “An evidence of mass-dependent differen- tial kinetic freeze-out scenario observed in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV,” European Physical Journal A , vol. 52, Aticle ID 203, 2016

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Hadron-Deuteron Correlations and Production of Light Nuclei in 14 Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions,

    S. Mrowczynski, P. Slon, “Hadron-Deuteron Correlations and Production of Light Nuclei in 14 Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions,” Acta Physica Polonica B , vol. 51, Aticle ID 1739, 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Production of Light Nuclei in the Thermal and Coalescence Models,

    St. Mrowczynski, “Production of Light Nuclei in the Thermal and Coalescence Models,” Acta Physica Polonica B , vol. 48, pp. 707, 2017

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    4He versus 4Li and production of light nuclei in relativistic heavy-ion col- lisions,

    St. Mrowczynski, “ 4He versus 4Li and production of light nuclei in relativistic heavy-ion col- lisions,” Modern Physics Letters A , vol. 33, Aticle ID 1850142, 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Production of light nuclei and hypernuclei at High Intensity Accelerator Facility energy region,

    P. Liu, J. H. Chen, Y. G. Ma and S. Zhang, “Production of light nuclei and hypernuclei at High Intensity Accelerator Facility energy region,” Nuclear Science and Techniques , vol. 28, Aticle ID 55, 2017

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Light (anti)nuclei production in Cu+Cu collisions at √sN N=200 GeV,

    F. X. Liu, G. Chen, Z. L. Zhe, D. M. Zhou and Y. L. Xie, “Light (anti)nuclei production in Cu+Cu collisions at √sN N=200 GeV,” European Physical Journal A , vol. 55, Aticle ID 160, 2019

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Transport model study of nuclear stopping in heavy-ion collisions over the energy range from 0.09A to 160A GeV,

    Y. Yuan, Q. F. Li, Z. X. Li, and F. H. Liu, “Transport model study of nuclear stopping in heavy-ion collisions over the energy range from 0.09A to 160A GeV,” Physical Review C , vol. 81, Aticle ID 034913, 2010

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Study of Production of (Anti-)deuteron Observed in Au+Au Collisions at √sN N= 14.5, 62.4, and 200 GeV,

    Y. Yuan, “Study of Production of (Anti-)deuteron Observed in Au+Au Collisions at √sN N= 14.5, 62.4, and 200 GeV,” Advances in High Energy Physics , vol. 2021, Aticle ID 9305605, 2021

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Accessing the in-medium effects on nucleon- nucleon elastic cross section with collective flows and nuclear stopping,

    P. C. Li, Y. J. Wang, Q. F. Li, H. F. Zhang, “Accessing the in-medium effects on nucleon- nucleon elastic cross section with collective flows and nuclear stopping,” Physics Letters B , vol. 828, Aticle ID 137019, 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Transport model study of transverse momen- tum distributions of (anti-)deuterons production in Au+Au collisions at √sN N= 14.5, 62.4, and 200 GeV,

    Y. Yuan, Z. Q. Huang, X. F. Zhang, X. Z. Wei, “Transport model study of transverse momen- tum distributions of (anti-)deuterons production in Au+Au collisions at √sN N= 14.5, 62.4, and 200 GeV,” Frontiers in Physics , vol. 10, Aticle ID 971407, 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Dependence of elliptic flows on transverse momentum and number of participants in AuAu collisions at 200 GeV,

    B. C. Li, Y. Y. Fu, L. L. Wang, F. H. Liu, “Dependence of elliptic flows on transverse momentum and number of participants in AuAu collisions at 200 GeV,” Journal of Physics G-Nuclear and Particle Physics , vol. 40, Aticle ID 025104, 2013

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Event patterns from negative pion spectra in proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus collisions at SPS,

    Y. H. Chen, F. H. Liu and Edward K. Sarkisyan-Grinbaum, “Event patterns from negative pion spectra in proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus collisions at SPS,” Chinese Physics C , vol. 42, no. 10, Article ID 104102, 2018

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Azimuthal anisotropy measurement of (multi)strange hadrons in Au+Au collisions at √sN N=54.4 GeV,

    M. S. Abdallah, et al. [STAR Collaboration], “Azimuthal anisotropy measurement of (multi)strange hadrons in Au+Au collisions at √sN N=54.4 GeV,” Physical Review C , vol. 15 107, Aticle ID 024912, 2023

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Pion, kaon, and (anti) proton production in U+U collisions at √sN N=193 GeV measured with the STAR detector

    M. S. Abdallah, et al. [STAR Collaboration], “Pion, kaon, and (anti) proton production in U+U collisions at √sN N=193 GeV measured with the STAR detector” Physical Review C , vol. 107, Aticle ID 024901, 2023

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    UrQMD-2.3 - Changes and Comparisons

    H. Petersen, M. Bleicher, S. A. Bass and H. Stocker, “UrQMD-2.3 - Changes and Compar- isons,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.0567

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    A Model For Low P(T) Hadronic Re- actions, With Generalizations To Hadron-Nucleus And Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions,

    B. Andersson, G. Gustafson and B. Nilsson-Almqvist, “A Model For Low P(T) Hadronic Re- actions, With Generalizations To Hadron-Nucleus And Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions,” Nuclear Physics B , vol. 281, no. 1-2, pp. 289-309, 1987

    work page 1987

  28. [28]

    Interactions Between Hadrons And Nuclei: The Lund Monte Carlo, Fritiof Version 1.6,

    B. Nilsson-Almqvist and E. Stenlund, “Interactions Between Hadrons And Nuclei: The Lund Monte Carlo, Fritiof Version 1.6,” Computer Physics Communications , vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 387-397, 1987

    work page 1987

  29. [29]

    High-energy physics event generation with PYTHIA 5.7 and JETSET 7.4,

    T. Sjostrand, “High-energy physics event generation with PYTHIA 5.7 and JETSET 7.4,” Computer Physics Communications , vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 74-89, 1994

    work page 1994

  30. [30]

    Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,

    S. A. Bass, M. Belkacem, M. Bleicher, M. Brandstetter, L. Bravina, C. Ernst, L. Gerland, M. Hofmann, S. Hofmann, J. Konopka, G. Mao, L. Neise, S. Soff, C. Spieles, H. Weber, L. A. Winckelmann, H. Stocker and W. Greiner, “Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , vol. 41, pp. 255-369, 1998

    work page 1998

  31. [31]

    Directed and elliptic flow in heavy-ion collisions from Ebeam = 90 MeV/nucleon to Ec.m. = 200 GeV/nucleon,

    H. Petersen, Q. F. Li, X. L. Zhu and M. Bleicher, “Directed and elliptic flow in heavy-ion collisions from Ebeam = 90 MeV/nucleon to Ec.m. = 200 GeV/nucleon,” Physical Review C , vol. 74, Aticle ID 064908, 2006

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Application of machine learning to study the effects of quadrupole deformation on the nucleus in heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energies (in Chinese),

    Gao Z P, Wang Y J, Li Q F, et al., “Application of machine learning to study the effects of quadrupole deformation on the nucleus in heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energies (in Chinese),” Sci Sin-Phys Mech Astron , vol. 52, Aticle ID 252010, 2022

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Imaging shapes of atomic nuclei in high- energy nuclear collisions

    M. I. Abdulhamid, et al. [STAR Collaboration], “Imaging shapes of atomic nuclei in high- energy nuclear collisions” Nature, vol. 635, 67-72, 2024

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Production probability of superheavy fragments at various initial deformations and orientations in the238U+238U reaction,

    Kai Zhao, Zhuxia Li, Xizhen Wu and Yingxun Zhang, “Production probability of superheavy fragments at various initial deformations and orientations in the238U+238U reaction,” Physical Review C, vol. 88, Aticle ID 044605, 2013

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultra- 16 relativistic quantum molecular dynamics model,

    M. Bleicher, E. Zabrodin, C. Spieles, S. A. Bass, C. Ernst, S. Soff, L. Bravina, M. Belkacem, H. Weber, H. Stocker and W. Greiner, “Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultra- 16 relativistic quantum molecular dynamics model,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1859-1896, 1999

    work page 1999

  36. [36]

    Azimuthal correlations of pions in relativistic heavy ion collisions at 1GeV/nucleon,

    S. A. Bass, C. Hartnack, H. Stocker and W. Greiner, “Azimuthal correlations of pions in relativistic heavy ion collisions at 1GeV/nucleon,” Physical Review C , vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 3343-3356, 1995

    work page 1995

  37. [37]

    Probing the equation of state with pions,

    Q. F. Li, Z. X. Li, S. Soff, M. Bleicher and H. Stoecker, “Probing the equation of state with pions,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics , vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 151-164, 2006

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    A model comparison of resonance lifetime modifications, a soft equation of state and non-Gaussian effects on π − π correlations at FAIR/AGS energies,

    Q. F. Li and M. Bleicher, “A model comparison of resonance lifetime modifications, a soft equation of state and non-Gaussian effects on π − π correlations at FAIR/AGS energies,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics , vol. 36, no. 1, Atricle ID 015111, 2009

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Simulation for Elliptic Flow of UU Collisions at CSR Energy Region in Lanzhou,

    K. J. Wu, X. F. Luo and F. Liu, “Simulation for Elliptic Flow of UU Collisions at CSR Energy Region in Lanzhou,” Chinese Physics C , vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 617-620, 2007. 17

    work page 2007