Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can No-Reference Quality-Assessment Methods Serve as Perceptual Losses for Super-Resolution?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.20392 v1 pith:VD6YFWFQ submitted 2024-05-30 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords methodslossesperceptualno-referenceoptimizationartifactsconstructingdeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Perceptual losses play an important role in constructing deep-neural-network-based methods by increasing the naturalness and realism of processed images and videos. Use of perceptual losses is often limited to LPIPS, a fullreference method. Even though deep no-reference image-qualityassessment methods are excellent at predicting human judgment, little research has examined their incorporation in loss functions. This paper investigates direct optimization of several video-superresolution models using no-reference image-quality-assessment methods as perceptual losses. Our experimental results show that straightforward optimization of these methods produce artifacts, but a special training procedure can mitigate them.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stochastic BIQA: Median Randomized Smoothing for Certified Blind Image Quality Assessment

    eess.IV 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Median smoothing plus a trained denoiser with ranking loss yields certified l2 robustness for no-reference image quality metrics while preserving correlation with subjective scores better than prior smoothing baselines.

Pith tools