Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Expanded Gating Ranges Improve Activation Functions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.20768 v1 pith:RCD34WNI submitted 2024-05-25 cs.NE cs.LG

classification cs.NEcs.LG
keywords activationfunctionsgatingexpandedfunctionarctanself-gatedexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Activation functions are core components of all deep learning architectures. Currently, the most popular activation functions are smooth ReLU variants like GELU and SiLU. These are self-gated activation functions where the range of the gating function is between zero and one. In this paper, we explore the viability of using arctan as a gating mechanism. A self-gated activation function that uses arctan as its gating function has a monotonically increasing first derivative. To make this activation function competitive, it is necessary to introduce a trainable parameter for every MLP block to expand the range of the gating function beyond zero and one. We find that this technique also improves existing self-gated activation functions. We conduct an empirical evaluation of Expanded ArcTan Linear Unit (xATLU), Expanded GELU (xGELU), and Expanded SiLU (xSiLU) and show that they outperform existing activation functions within a transformer architecture. Additionally, expanded gating ranges show promising results in improving first-order Gated Linear Units (GLU).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is SwiGLU's Open Positive Tail Necessary? Evidence from Closed-Tail Gating with MemGLU

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    At 9M and 30M parameters, a closed-tail gate (MemGLU) matches SwiGLU's validation NLL within about 0.1%, so SwiGLU's open positive tail is not necessary at those scales.

Pith tools