Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Large Language Models for Relevance Judgment in Product Search

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.00247 v2 pith:VBIPYLD5 submitted 2024-06-01 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords relevanceproductsearchjudgmentllmsmodelsattributeevaluators
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

High relevance of retrieved and re-ranked items to the search query is the cornerstone of successful product search, yet measuring relevance of items to queries is one of the most challenging tasks in product information retrieval, and quality of product search is highly influenced by the precision and scale of available relevance-labelled data. In this paper, we present an array of techniques for leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for automating the relevance judgment of query-item pairs (QIPs) at scale. Using a unique dataset of multi-million QIPs, annotated by human evaluators, we test and optimize hyper parameters for finetuning billion-parameter LLMs with and without Low Rank Adaption (LoRA), as well as various modes of item attribute concatenation and prompting in LLM finetuning, and consider trade offs in item attribute inclusion for quality of relevance predictions. We demonstrate considerable improvement over baselines of prior generations of LLMs, as well as off-the-shelf models, towards relevance annotations on par with the human relevance evaluators. Our findings have immediate implications for the growing field of relevance judgment automation in product search.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SAGE: Scalable AI Governance & Evaluation

    cs.IR 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SAGE co-evolves a relevance policy, expert-curated precedents, and a distilled LLM judge to grade search relevance at production scale, reporting 0.72–0.73 linear Cohen's kappa against humans and a 0.25% DAU lift at LinkedIn.

  2. PaSa: An LLM Agent for Comprehensive Academic Paper Search

    cs.IR 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PaSa, a two-agent LLM system trained with session-level RL, reports substantially higher recall than existing academic search baselines on complex paper-finding queries.

  3. CORE: A Unified Cascaded Ordinal Relevance Estimation Framework for E-commerce Search

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Cascaded binary relevance decisions with step-level GRPO and PostCoT distillation improve offline accuracy and cut online bad-case rate by 15.94% versus flat multi-class baselines.

Pith tools