Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Boosting Sortition via Proportional Representation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.00913 v1 pith:BF5Q3ISK submitted 2024-06-03 cs.GT

classification cs.GT
keywords coreproportionalrepresentationselectionselectedsortitionalgorithmapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Sortition is based on the idea of choosing randomly selected representatives for decision making. The main properties that make sortition particularly appealing are fairness -- all the citizens can be selected with the same probability -- and proportional representation -- a randomly selected panel probably reflects the composition of the whole population. When a population lies on a representation metric, we formally define proportional representation by using a notion called the core. A panel is in the core if no group of individuals is underrepresented proportional to its size. While uniform selection is fair, it does not always return panels that are in the core. Thus, we ask if we can design a selection algorithm that satisfies fairness and ex post core simultaneously. We answer this question affirmatively and present an efficient selection algorithm that is fair and provides a constant-factor approximation to the optimal ex post core. Moreover, we show that uniformly random selection satisfies a constant-factor approximation to the optimal ex ante core. We complement our theoretical results by conducting experiments with real data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Panel Complexity of Sortition: Is 12 Angry Men Enough?

    cs.GT 2025-04 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A random panel of size roughly (1/epsilon)^2 times a logarithmic factor guarantees near-optimal social outcomes with high probability, with matching lower bounds in participatory budgeting and facility location.

  2. Full Proportional Justified Representation

    cs.GT 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new axiom, Full Proportional Justified Representation, fills the fourth cell in the justified-representation taxonomy; priceable rules and Monroe's rule satisfy it, while PAV does not.

Pith tools