Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of Useful LLM Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.00936 v1 pith:XU7KDBBB submitted 2024-06-03 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsabilityagentcorecapabilitiesevaluationmethodsstage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

LLMs have gotten attention across various research domains due to their exceptional performance on a wide range of complex tasks. Therefore, refined methods to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs are needed to determine the tasks and responsibility they should undertake. Our study mainly discussed how LLMs, as useful tools, should be effectively assessed. We proposed the two-stage framework: from ``core ability'' to ``agent'', clearly explaining how LLMs can be applied based on their specific capabilities, along with the evaluation methods in each stage. Core ability refers to the capabilities that LLMs need in order to generate high-quality natural language texts. After confirming LLMs possess core ability, they can solve real-world and complex tasks as agent. In the "core ability" stage, we discussed the reasoning ability, societal impact, and domain knowledge of LLMs. In the ``agent'' stage, we demonstrated embodied action, planning, and tool learning of LLMs agent applications. Finally, we examined the challenges currently confronting the evaluation methods for LLMs, as well as the directions for future development.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Make a Video Call with LLM: A Measurement Campaign over Six Mainstream Apps

    cs.NI 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Commercial AI video chat apps differ by 4× in video bitrate, 10× in framerate, and from zero to 10+ minutes of visual memory, with none replying in under 1.5 seconds.

  2. Rethinking Role-Playing Evaluation: Anonymous Benchmarking and a Systematic Study of Personality Effects

    cs.CL 2026-03 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Hiding character names lowers role-play performance, and adding self-generated personality descriptions partially restores fidelity in anonymous role-playing.

Pith tools