REVIEW 3 cited by
RKLD: Reverse KL-Divergence-based Knowledge Distillation for Unlearning Personal Information in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the passage of the Right to Be Forgotten (RTBF) regulations and the scaling up of language model training datasets, research on model unlearning in large language models (LLMs) has become more crucial. Before the era of LLMs, machine unlearning research focused mainly on classification tasks in models with small parameters. In these tasks, the content to be forgotten or retained is clear and straightforward. However, as parameter sizes have grown and tasks have become more complex, balancing forget quality and model utility has become more challenging, especially in scenarios involving personal data instead of classification results. Existing methods based on gradient ascent and its variants often struggle with this balance, leading to unintended information loss or partial forgetting. To address this challenge, we propose RKLD, a novel \textbf{R}everse \textbf{KL}-Divergence-based Knowledge \textbf{D}istillation unlearning algorithm for LLMs targeting the unlearning of personal information. Through RKLD, we achieve significant forget quality and effectively maintain the model utility in our experiments.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
GROM: Gradient-Free Rapid One-Shot Machine Unlearning
A single closed-form ridge update to selected MLP layers removes targeted knowledge from LLMs in seconds, with state-of-the-art forgetting-utility trade-offs and quantization robustness.
-
Not Every Token Needs Forgetting: Selective Unlearning to Limit Change in Utility in Large Language Model Unlearning
SU uses two assistant models trained on different data splits to score tokens, then unlearns only tokens whose scores diverge, claiming better retain-set utility with comparable forget quality.
-
Step-by-Step Reasoning Attack: Revealing 'Erased' Knowledge in Large Language Models
Step-by-step reasoning prompts can recover purportedly erased facts from unlearned LLMs, but the paper's quantitative evidence is internally inconsistent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.