REVIEW 2 cited by
Retaining Key Information under High Compression Ratios: Query-Guided Compressor for LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The growing popularity of Large Language Models has sparked interest in context compression for Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the performance of previous methods degrades dramatically as compression ratios increase, sometimes even falling to the closed-book level. This decline can be attributed to the loss of key information during the compression process. Our preliminary study supports this hypothesis, emphasizing the significance of retaining key information to maintain model performance under high compression ratios. As a result, we introduce Query-Guided Compressor (QGC), which leverages queries to guide the context compression process, effectively preserving key information within the compressed context. Additionally, we employ a dynamic compression strategy. We validate the effectiveness of our proposed QGC on the Question Answering task, including NaturalQuestions, TriviaQA, and HotpotQA datasets. Experimental results show that QGC can consistently perform well even at high compression ratios, which also offers significant benefits in terms of inference cost and throughput.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FaithfulRAG: Fact-Level Conflict Modeling for Context-Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation
FaithfulRAG resolves knowledge conflicts in RAG by extracting the model's parametric facts, aligning them with context, and reasoning through discrepancies before generating an answer.
-
Small Language Models: Architectures, Techniques, Evaluation, Problems and Future Adaptation
A survey of small language models that organizes known methods into taxonomies but adds no new models, data, or validated benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.