Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

BWS: Best Window Selection Based on Sample Scores for Data Pruning across Broad Ranges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.03057 v1 pith:ADYLCLIW submitted 2024-06-05 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords selectionsubsetwindowbestacrossbroaddatatraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data subset selection aims to find a smaller yet informative subset of a large dataset that can approximate the full-dataset training, addressing challenges associated with training neural networks on large-scale datasets. However, existing methods tend to specialize in either high or low selection ratio regimes, lacking a universal approach that consistently achieves competitive performance across a broad range of selection ratios. We introduce a universal and efficient data subset selection method, Best Window Selection (BWS), by proposing a method to choose the best window subset from samples ordered based on their difficulty scores. This approach offers flexibility by allowing the choice of window intervals that span from easy to difficult samples. Furthermore, we provide an efficient mechanism for selecting the best window subset by evaluating its quality using kernel ridge regression. Our experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of BWS compared to other baselines across a broad range of selection ratios over datasets, including CIFAR-10/100 and ImageNet, and the scenarios involving training from random initialization or fine-tuning of pre-trained models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lightweight Dataset Pruning without Full Training via Example Difficulty and Prediction Uncertainty

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A lightweight score combining prediction mean and variance, plus ratio-adaptive Beta sampling, prunes datasets early in training and reaches 60% ImageNet accuracy at 90% pruning.

Pith tools