Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

DICE: Detecting In-distribution Contamination in LLM's Fine-tuning Phase for Math Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.04197 v2 pith:PC3MYR35 submitted 2024-06-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords contaminationdicedatain-distributionllmsperformancebenchmarksdetecting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The advancement of large language models (LLMs) relies on evaluation using public benchmarks, but data contamination can lead to overestimated performance. Previous researches focus on detecting contamination by determining whether the model has seen the exact same data during training. Besides, prior work has already shown that even training on data similar to benchmark data inflates performance, namely \emph{In-distribution contamination}. In this work, we argue that in-distribution contamination can lead to the performance drop on OOD benchmarks. To effectively detect in-distribution contamination, we propose DICE, a novel method that leverages the internal states of LLMs to locate-then-detect the contamination. DICE first identifies the most sensitive layer to contamination, then trains a classifier based on the internal states of that layer. Experiments reveal DICE's high accuracy in detecting in-distribution contamination across various LLMs and math reasoning datasets. We also show the generalization capability of the trained DICE detector, which is able to detect contamination across multiple benchmarks with similar distributions. Additionally, we find that DICE's predictions correlate with the performance of LLMs fine-tuned by either us or other organizations, achieving a coefficient of determination ($R^2$) between 0.61 and 0.75. The code and data are available at https://github.com/THU-KEG/DICE.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Re:Form -- Reducing Human Annotations in Scalable Formal Software Verification with RL in LLMs: A Preliminary Study on Dafny

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A minimal-prior pipeline with automated data curation and verifier-driven RL lets small LLMs generate verifiable Dafny specifications and beat larger proprietary models on a synthetic compositional benchmark.

  2. OIBench: Benchmarking Strong Reasoning Models with Olympiad in Informatics

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A private, contamination-resistant benchmark of 250 olympiad-level programming problems shows top reasoning models reaching about 36% solve rates, far above conventional models.

  3. Establishing Trustworthy LLM Evaluation via Shortcut Neuron Analysis

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Shortcut neuron patching suppresses benchmark-contamination shortcuts in LLMs and yields evaluation scores that strongly correlate with the external MixEval benchmark.

Pith tools