Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Paraphrasing in Affirmative Terms Improves Negation Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.07492 v1 pith:K25XU2VO submitted 2024-06-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords negationlanguageaffirmativenaturalunderstandinginterpretationsmodelstasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Negation is a common linguistic phenomenon. Yet language models face challenges with negation in many natural language understanding tasks such as question answering and natural language inference. In this paper, we experiment with seamless strategies that incorporate affirmative interpretations (i.e., paraphrases without negation) to make models more robust against negation. Crucially, our affirmative interpretations are obtained automatically. We show improvements with CondaQA, a large corpus requiring reasoning with negation, and five natural language understanding tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Robust Negation Text Representations

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Finetuning text encoders on taxonomy-guided, LLM-generated negation and hedging triples substantially improves negation benchmark performance while keeping general embedding quality roughly intact.

Pith tools